Amplifier Review

Pellar from AVID HiFi: The Company’s Entry Level Phono Amplifier

The Avid range of phono amps has sprouted a budget, model. Paul Rigby reviews the Pellar

Avid goes about its design in a different way to many other companies, it takes a top-down approach which, when you sit and think about it, makes perfect sense. Take the company’s range of phono amps. The first design in the range was the top-of-the-range, twin-box, Pulsare II. From that, the cheaper Pellere was developed which, in almost Biblical terms, begat the Pulsus and now, cheaper again, is this new model, the Pellar. The idea being to reduce the cost of the previous, higher range, product as much as possible without reducing the quality.

Pellar from AVID HiFi: A Low Cost Phono Amplifier

In Avid’s view, if you took the design approach in the opposite direction and began with the cheapest model first, then the better, dearer, models would not only lack focus but would encourage creative cul-de-sacs and would not benefit from the economies of scale that you can gain from using top-of-the-range components at cheaper prices which can then be trickled down to the lower priced models. Using this method, the audio philosophy gives the next model down a high benchmark to live up to. That even extends to basic phono amp features like loading, “On the Pellar, 47K is the default loading,” said Avid boss, Conrad Mas, “which is for a moving magnet. If you want to change that, you add externally fitted ‘loading plugs’ to the required value, to get the loading you want for a moving coil.”

Looking like a couple of RCA terminations, the plugs are packed with a resistor which matches your cartridge and plugs into the back of the Pellar’s chassis entering the circuit. Hence, when you buy your Pellar, talk to Avid and tell them what cartridge you have in your turntable and they will give you a set of loading plugs that will match your cartridge.

Pellar from AVID HiFi: A Low Cost Phono Amplifier

“It also means that you don’t have to go inside the box and mess around with jumper sockets and various other things like that. I don’t like people going inside boxes because that is where trouble begins. Whether that they damage the box or touch something they should not do and something goes bang. It’s not a good idea,” said Mas.

Although the Peller uses a basic DIP switch system, located underneath the chassis, because of the introduction of loading plugs, the phono amp doesn’t depend on the usual complex DIP switch array which can degrade the sound.

Taking the Pulsus as a template, Avid has utilised a lot of the Pulsus design in terms of its internal components but, “…we have crunched up the board so that we have made all the components a lot closer together,” said Mas.

The casework is slightly longer than the Pulsus because the company has integrated the, now tweaked, power supply within. Avid decided to go internal than rely on a cheaper wall-wart, “Those external power blocks that you plug into a wall? They are awful, horrible, nasty things. If you get three of them and measure all three then they will all measure differently. They are notoriously unreliable.”

Anyone concerned about a rise in distortive noise should, according to Mas, relax, “If you listen to the phono stage, you will find that, because of the design of the circuit, we have pretty much eliminated the noise issue.”

Spanning 305 x 250 x 110mm and weighing just 2.2kg, the Pellar is a neat system but, at £800, is this budget phono amp truly ‘budget’? Mas is adamant, “Avid is my company and I will always make a product that I would buy myself and listen to myself. And frankly, below £800 I would be pushing to make anything I would want sit down and listen to.”

Pellar from AVID HiFi: A Low Cost Phono Amplifier

I decided to break the sound quality tests into two parts, using MM with a cheaper Trichord Dino (£499) phono reference and the MC with the dearer Icon PS3 (£2300) reference. Often, relative price points fail to reveal the whole truth about two competing products. On price terms, the Pellar should walk all over the Dino and struggle against the PS3. So did the Pellar default to type?


You know, the original definition for ‘Pellar’ derives from a Cornish dialect word meaning wizard, exorcist or conjurer and there is something in that translation when you listen to this box. Plugging in my T+A G10 and spinning Yehudi Menuhin’s Mendelssohn and Bruch Concertos (HiQ) and Bruch’s Violin Concerto No.1 in G minor Op.26, the Pellar showed a rock solid stereo image that not only fixed Menuhin to the soundstage but also allowed it to become a far more balanced backdrop for the orchestra, supplementing texture with a believable degree of support that added colour and depth to Menuhin’s exertions. In fact, before we get to the maestro, where the cheaper Dino had trouble connecting the two, the Pellar allowed the orchestra to leap from the rear of the soundstage, becoming wholly involved in the performance. That Pellar-inspired partnership ebbed and flowed like a rhythmic tide. As for Menuhin himself? The Pellar allowed the great man’s violin to roam, following his more delicate turns of phrase that swept with a dual combination of romance and heartbreak to a more robust, almost confrontational aspect. The upper mids stretched and metamorphosed along with Menuhin’s mood. Bass was not a major player here but what there was quietly confident and supportive.

Pellar from AVID HiFi: A Low Cost Phono Amplifier

Moving to jazz vocal and the original Chris Conner album, He Love Me, He Loves Me Not (Atlantic). On High On A Windy Hill, the Conner voice has a brushed, husky flavour which gives any song she sings a distinct delivery. Here, however, the Pellar added a lightness of touch to the voice that, while still retaining that textural husky nature, reminded the ear that this was a lady singing and not several sheets of sandpaper flying in formation. The lightness of tone gave Conner a vulnerability plus a degree of emotional helplessness to the delivery, the midrange being full of detail that added import to the song. The featured harp was helped by a clarity in both the upper mids and treble while the carefully restrained percussion added enough bass to bring a level of structure to the arrangement.

Moving to rock and King Crimson’s Three Of A Perfect Pair which really worked the Spendor S3-5R2’s bass abilities. Partly with Bill Bruford’s adept and flighty percussive power but also bass player, Tony Levin, who kept the track moving with his complex finger work. The Pellar was up to the task here, tracking the lower frequencies with aplomb. There is a slight excess in compression on this mix which can lead to a slight lifting in the upper mids, especially when lead singer, Adrian Below, hits a crescendo. The Pellar recognised that the compression was there and certainly flagged the effect but its relatively high resolution helped to prevent pain to the ears.

Moving to MC and back to Menuhin which, although faced with the mighty PS3, the Pellar offered a very clean, low distortion approach that gave the violin a certain clarity and sparkle. While the PS3 offered more air and intimacy, getting close enough to the maestro to be liberally sprinkled with sweat from his energetic performance, the Pellar majored on the bigger picture. Lacking the detail of the PS3, the Pellar succeeded in broadcasting the epic quality of the track. Bass was big and portentous while the midrange was nothing short of epic. For the Pellar, this performance was grand, it was significant and magnificent to behold. While the PS3 snuggled you in close to the delicate emotion, the Pellar addressed the orchestra on equal terms, giving the second violin section a more significant role in the track. Nothing short of democratic in how it addressed the arrangement, the Pellar arguably offered a more balanced transcription of the track.

Pellar from AVID HiFi: A Low Cost Phono Amplifier

Via Conner’s jazz ballad, the Pellar took the broader point of view to the PS3’s more detailed, intimate take on the arrangement. While the PS3 focused on Conner’s smoky, rather husky delivery, the Pellar continued to address her emotional interpretation but restrained the smoky nature of the Conner vocal a touch to encourage the backing band to take a greater role, bringing in the bass that rooted the track in a solid manner and the upper mids of the wind instruments.

The sense of clarity promoted by the Pellar was emphasised within King Crimson’s rock track. The soundstage offered such a low noise platform that bass was free to articulate itself in a supremely precise manner. The complex bass guitar was easily discerned, percussion was both crisp and punchy while the upper mids offered no bloom, no smearing or stridency, just a damn good performance that belied its price.


Because the Pellar cuts the sonic rubbish out of the aural picture, the low distortion sound provides excellent instrumental separation that allows the ear to pick up subtle sounds that are often hidden behind the distortion giving the music an evenly representative presentation, addressing the mix as a whole.


Price: £800


Tel: 01480 869 900

GOOD: value for money, design, overall sound quality, flexibility

BAD: nothing



T+A G10 turntable

SME 9 tonearm

Benz Glider cartridge

Trichord Dino phono amplifier

Rega Brio-R amplifier

Spendor S3-5R2 speakers

Blue Horizon Professional Rack System

Harmonic Resolution Systems Noise Reduction Components

All vinyl was cleaned using an Audio Desk’s Ultrasonic Pro Vinyl Cleaner 

You Might Also Like


  • Reply
    5th January 2018 at 7:53 pm

    What a stunning review! Great sentences all the way. I would buy one and i don’t even have a turntable yet. Why not a nine or even a ten if i may ask?

    Best wishes


  • Reply
    6th January 2018 at 12:06 pm

    I will read your rules again, but still. Great stuff! For the money maybe the best i have read about in 5 years.

    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      6th January 2018 at 1:28 pm

      Hi Geoff – To answer you more directly (which is what I should have done in the first place 🙂 ) – I suppose the only minor wrinkle is the arm. The turntable is too good for it. I’d go for the SME.

  • Reply
    6th January 2018 at 9:38 pm

    Hello Paul,

    I was actually talking about the phono amp. For the money it seems to do everything right. And i love the way you describe everything. So that’s why i was maybe expecting a nine. But no worries. It got me checking out Avid and that’s the most important thing.

    Best regards

    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      7th January 2018 at 11:21 am

      Sorry Geoff – I’ll wake up in a minute 🙂 I think if the price had been a tad lower, I would have awarded the ‘9’. But that’s nit-picking really. It’s an excellent box.

  • Reply
    16th February 2019 at 2:59 pm

    Thanks for a great review! I would like to know if Arcam rPhono is anywhere near the sound quality of the Avid.

    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      17th February 2019 at 11:11 am

      Thanks Szoze – the Pellar is far superior but you have to be aware that the AVID is three times the price of the Arcam. So, if your budget is squeezed, the Arcam is a definite contender.

      • Reply
        5th March 2019 at 6:01 pm

        Thanks. During the last week I compared rphono, pellar and musical fidelity mx-vynl. Mx-vynl was the winner for me. Natural sounding with great clarity warmth and naturalness. Pellar was great, maybe a little hard sounding. Rphono great for the money.

        • Reply
          Paul Rigby
          5th March 2019 at 6:08 pm

          Hi Szoze – many thanks for your insight, appreciate it.

  • Reply
    Joao Guedes
    15th December 2020 at 6:02 pm

    Hi Paul,
    I read with interest a lot of your reviews regarding phono preamplifiers and, if I may, I would like to ask your advice between two products that you already reviewd – The Avid Pellar and the Trichord Dino+NCPSU.
    As a turntable, I have a Linn LP12+Lingo4 (power supply) + Dynavector DV20 X (high output MC).
    As phono pre, I am currently using a Musical Surroundings Phonomena and I would like to upgrade to something a bit better. Which one do you recommend? Or are there other suitable options for the same kind of budget that I am not considering or aware of?
    Thank you in advance,
    Joao Guedes (Portugal)

    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      16th December 2020 at 10:31 am

      Whats your budget for this please Joao?

  • Reply
    23rd January 2021 at 9:24 pm

    Hi Paul
    How do you compare it against Vertere Acoustics Phono-1 MkII


    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      26th January 2021 at 11:54 am

      I haven’t heard that one yet Behzad, but colleagues tell me they like it very much indeed.

  • Reply
    James Burns
    5th April 2021 at 8:11 pm

    Hi Paul, now that you have reviewed the Vertere Phono 1 how does it stack up against the Pellar? Love the site/channel.

    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      8th April 2021 at 4:18 pm

      I wish I had a Pellar still here to tell you 🙂 Such is the frustration of reviews. You have to give the kit back which often means it’s not here to do A-B tests. Both are excellent and you won’t be disappointed with either of them. I’d look for the best deal and go with that. Sorry I couldn’t help further.

    Leave a Reply

    By using this website you agree to accept our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Share This
    %d bloggers like this: