The Article
6000A Integrated Amplifier From Audiolab
1st July 2019
Adopting a traditional and solid form factor on the outside, Paul Rigby realises that the magic is occurring under the lid
The thing about the 6000A, when the aesthetics are considered, is that it looks like an integrated amplifier. Don’t dismiss that point. It’s actually critical to target sales. I say again, the 6000A looks like a traditional integrated amplifier. It looks safe. It looks steady and solid. It doesn’t try anything fancy. You would never accuse the chassis of ever emerging from an Italian design studio. There’s no chic fashion sense with this one. If you saw this box in the 80s, it would look rather racy, that’s for sure, but it wouldn’t look too out of place.
For some users, that is all they want. And that’s important. Weird and even slightly off-kilter designs can scare and make certain hi-fi fans feel uncomfortable. Even slightly conservative half-width amplifiers can be an issue for some.
The 6000A – at least on the outside – is the Mother’s Pride processed white loaf of amplifier design. You can see it for what it is at 30 paces. Again, I’m not damning this amp with faint praise when I say that. That’s not a bad thing. It’s a firm design choice.
Before I began the review of this box, I was comforted to know that the designer of the 6000A was also the same designer of the older 8300A. Jan Ertner took the basis of the latter to create the former which meant that hard won knowledge was now being refined and improved upon. There’s nothing worse than a single line of products that feature a host of designers who not only constantly reinvent the wheel but often make the same old mistakes over and over again (it’s happened many times in the past). Not here. So I already had a sense of confidence going into this one.
This is an amplifier but it features other components too. The ES9018 Sabre32 Reference DAC is one of those, featuring 32bit HyperStream architecture and Time Domain Jitter Eliminator. Again, this chip is not a foreign component. You’ll find it in the company’s M-DAC. Continuity again.
Connected to the DAC are the 6000A’s four digital inputs – two coaxial and two optical – which handle 24bit/192kHz. Tagged to these are user-selectable digital filters: Fast Roll-Off, Slow Roll-Off and Minimum Phase. I’ll say now that I normally hate these sort of things. Anything that takes me away from a pure, default, flat signal is an experience as near to abhorrent as I’m likely to find. That said, I’ll give them all a test in due course.
Streaming is also possible via Bluetooth (plus the now usual aptX codec).
A Class AB amplifier, that can also be used as a pre-amp and as a power amplifier too, the integrated mode of the design pumps out 50W per channel into 8 Ohms, the output stage of the discrete power amp circuits uses a CFB (Complementary Feedback) topology plus a meaty 200VA toroidal transformer followed by four 15000uF reservoir capacity (60000uF in total). The idea is to reduce the strain upon the amplifier and to maintain a sort of backup of power, ready to use.
Audiolab has included a phono stage for moving magnet phono cartridges – a JFET-based circuit with RIAA equalisation. A dedicated headphone amp with current-feedback circuitry is also included.
Spanning 445 x 65.5 x 300mm and weighing 7.8kg, the 6000A is available in a choice of silver or black.
SOUND QUALITY
I started with Mike Oldfield and his Platinum (Virgin) LP from 1979. I played Into the Wonderland, featuring vocals by Wendy Roberts. A sweet, beautifully melodic and slightly melancholic, low key ballad with a high-energy, rocking finish.
I suppose, if I were to describe the 6000A in one word, it would be confident. This amplifier is not shy, it doesn’t try to hide any aspect of its sound envelope. The 6000A will never die wondering. That is, the 6000A gives its all in the cause of making you happy.
The overall presentation from the Audiolab 6000A was balanced and balanced means you get to hear some bass. This is not always the case for mid-placed budget equipment. Bass is often sacrificed or at least trimmed to some extent. Even the best sub-£1,000 amplifiers out there love to trim bass. It’s a cost issue. That doesn’t happen with the 6000A.
The 6000A allows bass into the soundstage. That means that both the percussion and bass guitar were not only able to ground the music and stop it flapping in the wind but also offer a solid, rhythmic pace to the whole arrangement. That is, there was a sense of order here. The music flowed with an added, deeper groove. The structure was both solid and funky.
One of the persistent fears I have as a reviewer, from amplifiers designed at this price point, is frequency discipline. This is another reason that may sub-£1000 amplifiers are rather bass shy. Most of them can’t handle it. Too much of it, at any rate.
That is, there is a danger of allowing too much bass into the soundstage because it may create a warming feeling, leaking into the midrange and creating a sepia-like effect. Again, that never occurred with the 6000A. Frequency discipline was paramount so bass stayed put and never bloomed into the mids.
In fact, let’s pause for a moment here to dwell and emphasise this one feature. If I was going to pin one all-important factor for the success of the 6000A it would be tonal balance. In fact, you could ally tonal balance as being the killer feature of the 6000A. The headline. Tonal balance is the underlying strength of the 6000A. I really haven’t heard anything like it under £1,000.
The upper midrange was delightfully detailed and accurate although fragility and delicacy were not great priorities, I have to say. I never saw reverb tails of filigree lattice flowing from cymbal taps but this is a £599 amplifier we’re talking about here, not a £5,999 design. So no, don’t expect that but do expect to hear everything that a £599 amplifier can provide: complex and chaotic lead guitar with enough precision to make sense, wind instruments that feature a character and lightness of touch and a layered soundstage that revealed even shy instruments lurking at the rear of the mix.
Before I moved from vinyl, note that the built-in phono amplifier is a good one. An external model is better but the internal model will be fine for those of a budget. Buy an external model when you can, though.
I then turned to Bluetooth which I paired to my iPhone 8. Pairing is automatic. That is, you select Bluetooth as a source on the amplifier and the 6000A pops up on your Bluetooth screen on your phone. Painless and easy pairing. I played Marvin Gaye’s Mercy Mercy Me as a lossy file. Often, playing such a file in this way results in a bright and edgy play response but not here. The 6000A was able to calm any possible issues. So while the midrange was lacking insight, bass was hardly focused and treble was almost a non-entity, none of that was the 6000A’s fault. In fact, the 6000A made the best of a bad job, providing a perfectly listenable track without any nasty sonic responses. What I liked about the 6000A’s take on Bluetooth was the creation of a wide soundstage and, because lots of space was now on offer, the instrumental separation that also followed. Allowing each instrument within the mix to be presented on its own, adding to the complexity of the presentation.
Next up, I plugged in my Astell&Kern AK120 into the rear-mounted optical port and played Dire Straits’ So Far Away from their Brothers in Arms album. I liked the way the 6000A handled this 24bit/88.2kHz track because the track was mastered with excessive peak limiting creating a compressed sound. The low noise aspect of the 6000A, the balanced and controlling nature of the upper frequencies and the solid bass foundation allowed this track to be broadcast in a mature and stable fashion. To such an extent that the compressed element was no longer a real issue.
Playing the restful piano tinklings of Erik Satie at the same resolution was a relaxing and enjoyable experience. The potentially chaotic resonance of the piano was handled well by the 6000A in terms of control while the nuanced nature of the keys and pedals from the Satie piano was transcribed with both ease and insight to give the performance a sense of delicacy alongside that sense of authority.
I then took a quick listen at the range of DAC-related filters available within the unit. In the 6000A’s manual, the Phase filter is talked about as if the resultant sound resembled analogue but I had to disagree. The presentation emerged from cotton wool, sounding overly damped with a lack of precision and midrange insight.
The Slow filter reduced that effect dramatically while Fast was a default flat response. I hold my hands up here. I had to eat my words with these filters because my preference leaned towards the Slow filter which I actually found superior to Fast. The latter is supposed to be default and flat but I found Fast to be a touch edgy.
So, thumbs up to Audiolab. I never thought I would actually hear a usable filter on any piece of hi-fi equipment but, blow me down, Audiolab has created the very thing.
One important thing. Critical if you’re sound testing the 6000A and the DAC is significant to you. Make sure you properly review the amplifier with each and every filter. Cycle through each in turn and give each one time. Punching in any one of these filters will change the inherent character of the 6000A’s DAC. For example, if you talked to me about the 6000A having only listened to the Fast filter and I replied to you having only listened to the Slow filter, we’d effectively be talking about two different amps.
Hence, don’t judge the 6000A until you’ve heard all three filters. Listen to your Uncle Paul on this one.
Finally, I plugged in my reference headphones to listen to Satie via the internal headphone amplifier. While there may have been a limit on midrange extension, within the confines of the head amp’s performance envelope, the sound was admirable indeed offering plenty of refined detail on offer plus light and shade to add interest.
CONCLUSION
I listened to this amplifier for some time and realised that the basic presentation was supremely balanced in terms of how it delivered music to the ear. Some hi-fi components do one thing very well and if you’re looking at a budget component that can often be a fascinating experience because build budgets often preclude a generally good performance. The 6000A is one of those pieces of kit that does its best to do everything very well indeed.
Of course, it can’t. Not really. Money won’t let it. That doesn’t stop to trying, though.
In terms of ‘can’t’, what the 6000A doesn’t give you an extended dynamic reach. That high ceiling that higher-end amplifiers provide to allow the upper midrange to soar.
Now, some amplifiers in this price range will give you that. But then they will fall over very badly in other areas because too much emphasis has been placed upon that soaring thing for the build budget limits. So, for example, you may come across an amplifier that offers great midrange extension but the bass will be lacking. In other words, you go too far in one direction? You pay for it in another.
The 6000A doesn’t do that either. It never actually falls down. It never leaves you feeling, “Wow, it does this and this amazingly well but I wish it didn’t do that…” You won’t give that response to a 6000A listening session.
In short, the 6000A provides the perfect balance of performance to a build budget. It’s the perfect compromise. Every part of the sound envelope has been looked at and enhanced to the point when the money ran out. Then Audiolab stopped at that point.
Hence the 6000A squeezes every last penny of performance from your £599. If the designers had been told that the price was £649, they would have improved everything a bit more. For £699? Everything would have been improved a bit more still. You see? The 6000A is even handed, offers great sound and is one of the best value amplifiers on the market. If you want to hear how your money has been spent, buy a 6000A.
Bottom line? The Audiolab 6000A is better than you think.
AUDIOLAB 6000A INTEGRATED AMPLIFIER
Price £599
Website: www.audiolab.co.uk
TO BUY CLICK BELOW:
USA – https://amzn.to/383xoR3
EUROPE – https://amzn.to/3mMazW8
GOOD: confident bass, instrumental separation, upper midrange detail, balanced output
BAD: nothing
RATING: 9
[Don’t forget to check out my Facebook Group, The Audiophile Man: Hi-Fi & Music here: www.facebook.com/groups/theaudiophileman for exclusive postings, exclusive editorial and more!]
REFERENCE
Pro-Ject RPM3 Turntable
Tellurium Q & QED cabling
Blue Horizon Professional Rack System
Harmonic Resolution Systems Noise Reduction Components
All vinyl was cleaned using an Audio Desk’s Ultrasonic Pro Vinyl Cleaner
Ha! Didn‚Äôt think I‚Äôd loaded the question… The internal pre-amp is equal if not better than my Rega a2d, so I was just wondering how much more would one need to spend to get an improvement from a stand-alone pre-out.
Again, I’d need a price because otherwise you’re talking ‘how long is a piece of string’.
Apologies. Ok, so would the Rega Fono MM at £200 provide a sonic advantage or would I need to spend more?
Hi Carwyn – indeed, yes. In and around that price point, you might also want to consider the:
Schiit Mani: https://theaudiophileman.com/schitt-mani/ Price is now £140 I think.
also this one from Longdog: https://theaudiophileman.com/ph-1-ha-1-phono-amplifier-longdog-review/
Thank you Paul. I had assumed due to economics that there would be a ceiling where an external phono amp would outperform an internal. Just didn’t know where that ceiling was. And thanks for your page. It’s great stuff, and I’m an avid follower even though this is the first time in be raise my head over the parapet. Car.
Hi Car – I would say that all external phono amps (proper phono amps, ¬£60 in general terms – let’s ignore the cheapo Chinese imports) would out-perform internal models, assuming the rest of the hi-fi chain has been set up properly and that chain is not already infused with high frequency noise. The only internal models that I’ve heard and enjoyed where in an all in one from Moon (¬£5K) and an integrated amp from AVID (¬£13k). And thanks for popping your head above the parapet 🙂
The Schiit Mani has arrived. You were indeed correct, the light on the front is capable of retina burning. Some tape as advised has been applied.
Nice one 🙂
I am considering the Audiolab 6000A vs the Heed Elixir both of which you rated very highly. Do you have a preference and why?
I generally find mid price solid state to lack rich mids, and add an unnatural edge or brightness in place of real detail. I’m looking for a life like sound, and an amp that can make music beautiful or toe tapping as called for, not just cold analytic detail. I want to be immersed in the beauty and delicacy of sounds. I want a large airey sounstage in all directions. A beautiful performance should bring tears to my eyes. I’m not interested in cold hard facts detailed by a scientist devoid of emotion. But I want detail too, not edge.
Hi Gary – indeed, I dislike the those sonic elements you listed too. “Life like” is a big ask, I have to say and one that is often in the ear of the beholder 🙂 That said, the 6000A should provide a tonal balance that appeals. The Heed is superb, I have to say so if you prefer a half-width unit because of space issues, then you won’t be disappointed.
The shape and style of the unit is secondary to me, so isn’t part of the equation.
Would you be able to tell me if the 6000A is takes a clinical approach to music, and whether the Heed Elixir takes a soft approach but expresses emotion better?
I’m looking for an amplifier that can express emotion, but is still detailed, and not bright or edgy. Which of these 2 amps do you think would fit that description best?
Hi Gary – neither are bright. The 6000A is tonally more balanced as it handles bass in a mature fashion.
If you were in search of an amplifier in this price range, which of the 2 amps would you buy for yourself, based strictly on sound?
Audiolab 6000A or Heed Elixir?
Thanks for your input.
Gary
6000A
Thanks Paul
Any opinions on how the the newer Rega Brio (2017), and the Cambridge Audio CXA61 or CXA81 compare soundwise to the Audiolab 6000A?
All are excellent and if you have a hankering for any of them, then you won’t be disappointed. They all perform well. I like the Audiolab because of its tonal balance and how it handles bass.
Hi Paul, how would you compare the Audiolab 6000A against the Iotavx Sa3 with regards to sound? Which one would be your pick? Thanks
The 6000A – if you added the Iotvx power amp (also reviewed), then I’m not sure because I haven’t done that comparison. As is, though, the 6000A.
Thanks so much.
Hi Paul,
Thank you for your always well-written reviews ! I have a question about the 6000A DAC.
Context : I’m considering getting a 6000A as a replacement for my Audio Analogue Crescendo amp. I was at first leaning toward the Heed Elixir that I tried a few months ago.My two sources are a Pro-Ject turntable and a Bluesound node 2i.
Question : Would I benefit from plugging the Node 2i to the digital input of the 6000A or would it be redundant (rather than, let’s say, to an analog input of the Heed) ?
Best regards,
Hi LouisR – thanks for your kind words, the 2i features its own DAC so I plugged straight into my amp’s inputs. I love the Heed as an amplifier although I’d say that the 6000A is tonally more balanced. But if you’re stuck on the Heed, you won’t be disappointed.
Hi Paul, thank you for this review. It has pushed me to purchase the 6000A (arriving today). I love that you take the time to respond to every comment on here!! That’s just superb.
I do have a question if I may. My current set up is a 5.1.2 system for movies with the Monitor Audio Silver 8’s as L R, Silver 150 as C, Bronze 1’s as surround and KEF T150’s as atmos on the ceiling. They are all powered through my Denon X3500h AVR with the exception of the L R Silver 8’s that go through my late Grandfathers old Rotel RA-03 (which the Audiolab will replace) via the preout’s. My question is, I’m starting to listen to more and more stereo music via Amazon Music HD that I have currently been sending to the AVR via bluetooth. Will the Audiolab create a better sound than the Rotel? Will sending the music from Amazon straight to the Audiolab via bluetooth create a better sound than going through the Denon AVR? And finally, is there a ‘better’ solution than using bluetooth?
Thanks again!
Thanks Phil and yes, the Audiolab will be better than the Rotel. You can go further by separating the Bluetooth module and putting that in its own chassis. For example, the Bluesound Streamer which features Bluetooth. There’s a general rule – hi-fi hardware is anti-social. It sounds better alone, separated from each other. When you bundle lots of features inside one chassis, it causes issues such as electrical interference leaks to neighbouring components, veiling sound and lowering sonic quality. Separating those components stops that and improves sound quality. Check out the review here: https://theaudiophileman.com/2i-wireless-streamer-review-bluesound/
Thank you. I’ll look into the link you sent me. Listening to the new amp now and so far I’m loving it. Just makes me want to spend more on new speakers lol.
Hi Phil, I have the AVR-x3500h like you and am looking forward to home-testing Audiolab’s 6000a this weekend using the pre-outs on the Denon into the 6000a. What does the Bluetooth DAC on the 6000a sound like and did the 6000a improve the front L&R speakers in your setup?
What a great write up, I have the Audiolab 6000a & 6000n and love them, I’m selling my B&W 602s3 speakers and on the lookout for new, I’ve got KEF R3, Monitor Audio Gold 100, Martin Logan Motion 35xt on my radar, do you have any thoughts on a speaker pairing for me?
I haven’t tested those Steve but colleagues do praise the KEFs. Thin about the Spendor A1 stand mounts too.
Cheers Paul,
There are some Monitor Audio Platinum 100 inc their stands going for approx £1400 these are the MK1 version, are they worth considering, or is this a bit of a push for the 6000a?
Hi Steve – to be honest, I’d go for these instead and they would be ok with the 6000A amp: https://theaudiophileman.com/monitor-audio-silver-300-speakers-review/