The Article
6000A Integrated Amplifier From Audiolab
1st July 2019
Adopting a traditional and solid form factor on the outside, Paul Rigby realises that the magic is occurring under the lid
The thing about the 6000A, when the aesthetics are considered, is that it looks like an integrated amplifier. Don’t dismiss that point. It’s actually critical to target sales. I say again, the 6000A looks like a traditional integrated amplifier. It looks safe. It looks steady and solid. It doesn’t try anything fancy. You would never accuse the chassis of ever emerging from an Italian design studio. There’s no chic fashion sense with this one. If you saw this box in the 80s, it would look rather racy, that’s for sure, but it wouldn’t look too out of place.
For some users, that is all they want. And that’s important. Weird and even slightly off-kilter designs can scare and make certain hi-fi fans feel uncomfortable. Even slightly conservative half-width amplifiers can be an issue for some.
The 6000A – at least on the outside – is the Mother’s Pride processed white loaf of amplifier design. You can see it for what it is at 30 paces. Again, I’m not damning this amp with faint praise when I say that. That’s not a bad thing. It’s a firm design choice.
Before I began the review of this box, I was comforted to know that the designer of the 6000A was also the same designer of the older 8300A. Jan Ertner took the basis of the latter to create the former which meant that hard won knowledge was now being refined and improved upon. There’s nothing worse than a single line of products that feature a host of designers who not only constantly reinvent the wheel but often make the same old mistakes over and over again (it’s happened many times in the past). Not here. So I already had a sense of confidence going into this one.
This is an amplifier but it features other components too. The ES9018 Sabre32 Reference DAC is one of those, featuring 32bit HyperStream architecture and Time Domain Jitter Eliminator. Again, this chip is not a foreign component. You’ll find it in the company’s M-DAC. Continuity again.
Connected to the DAC are the 6000A’s four digital inputs – two coaxial and two optical – which handle 24bit/192kHz. Tagged to these are user-selectable digital filters: Fast Roll-Off, Slow Roll-Off and Minimum Phase. I’ll say now that I normally hate these sort of things. Anything that takes me away from a pure, default, flat signal is an experience as near to abhorrent as I’m likely to find. That said, I’ll give them all a test in due course.
Streaming is also possible via Bluetooth (plus the now usual aptX codec).
A Class AB amplifier, that can also be used as a pre-amp and as a power amplifier too, the integrated mode of the design pumps out 50W per channel into 8 Ohms, the output stage of the discrete power amp circuits uses a CFB (Complementary Feedback) topology plus a meaty 200VA toroidal transformer followed by four 15000uF reservoir capacity (60000uF in total). The idea is to reduce the strain upon the amplifier and to maintain a sort of backup of power, ready to use.
Audiolab has included a phono stage for moving magnet phono cartridges – a JFET-based circuit with RIAA equalisation. A dedicated headphone amp with current-feedback circuitry is also included.
Spanning 445 x 65.5 x 300mm and weighing 7.8kg, the 6000A is available in a choice of silver or black.
SOUND QUALITY
I started with Mike Oldfield and his Platinum (Virgin) LP from 1979. I played Into the Wonderland, featuring vocals by Wendy Roberts. A sweet, beautifully melodic and slightly melancholic, low key ballad with a high-energy, rocking finish.
I suppose, if I were to describe the 6000A in one word, it would be confident. This amplifier is not shy, it doesn’t try to hide any aspect of its sound envelope. The 6000A will never die wondering. That is, the 6000A gives its all in the cause of making you happy.
The overall presentation from the Audiolab 6000A was balanced and balanced means you get to hear some bass. This is not always the case for mid-placed budget equipment. Bass is often sacrificed or at least trimmed to some extent. Even the best sub-£1,000 amplifiers out there love to trim bass. It’s a cost issue. That doesn’t happen with the 6000A.
The 6000A allows bass into the soundstage. That means that both the percussion and bass guitar were not only able to ground the music and stop it flapping in the wind but also offer a solid, rhythmic pace to the whole arrangement. That is, there was a sense of order here. The music flowed with an added, deeper groove. The structure was both solid and funky.
One of the persistent fears I have as a reviewer, from amplifiers designed at this price point, is frequency discipline. This is another reason that may sub-£1000 amplifiers are rather bass shy. Most of them can’t handle it. Too much of it, at any rate.
That is, there is a danger of allowing too much bass into the soundstage because it may create a warming feeling, leaking into the midrange and creating a sepia-like effect. Again, that never occurred with the 6000A. Frequency discipline was paramount so bass stayed put and never bloomed into the mids.
In fact, let’s pause for a moment here to dwell and emphasise this one feature. If I was going to pin one all-important factor for the success of the 6000A it would be tonal balance. In fact, you could ally tonal balance as being the killer feature of the 6000A. The headline. Tonal balance is the underlying strength of the 6000A. I really haven’t heard anything like it under £1,000.
The upper midrange was delightfully detailed and accurate although fragility and delicacy were not great priorities, I have to say. I never saw reverb tails of filigree lattice flowing from cymbal taps but this is a £599 amplifier we’re talking about here, not a £5,999 design. So no, don’t expect that but do expect to hear everything that a £599 amplifier can provide: complex and chaotic lead guitar with enough precision to make sense, wind instruments that feature a character and lightness of touch and a layered soundstage that revealed even shy instruments lurking at the rear of the mix.
Before I moved from vinyl, note that the built-in phono amplifier is a good one. An external model is better but the internal model will be fine for those of a budget. Buy an external model when you can, though.
I then turned to Bluetooth which I paired to my iPhone 8. Pairing is automatic. That is, you select Bluetooth as a source on the amplifier and the 6000A pops up on your Bluetooth screen on your phone. Painless and easy pairing. I played Marvin Gaye’s Mercy Mercy Me as a lossy file. Often, playing such a file in this way results in a bright and edgy play response but not here. The 6000A was able to calm any possible issues. So while the midrange was lacking insight, bass was hardly focused and treble was almost a non-entity, none of that was the 6000A’s fault. In fact, the 6000A made the best of a bad job, providing a perfectly listenable track without any nasty sonic responses. What I liked about the 6000A’s take on Bluetooth was the creation of a wide soundstage and, because lots of space was now on offer, the instrumental separation that also followed. Allowing each instrument within the mix to be presented on its own, adding to the complexity of the presentation.
Next up, I plugged in my Astell&Kern AK120 into the rear-mounted optical port and played Dire Straits’ So Far Away from their Brothers in Arms album. I liked the way the 6000A handled this 24bit/88.2kHz track because the track was mastered with excessive peak limiting creating a compressed sound. The low noise aspect of the 6000A, the balanced and controlling nature of the upper frequencies and the solid bass foundation allowed this track to be broadcast in a mature and stable fashion. To such an extent that the compressed element was no longer a real issue.
Playing the restful piano tinklings of Erik Satie at the same resolution was a relaxing and enjoyable experience. The potentially chaotic resonance of the piano was handled well by the 6000A in terms of control while the nuanced nature of the keys and pedals from the Satie piano was transcribed with both ease and insight to give the performance a sense of delicacy alongside that sense of authority.
I then took a quick listen at the range of DAC-related filters available within the unit. In the 6000A’s manual, the Phase filter is talked about as if the resultant sound resembled analogue but I had to disagree. The presentation emerged from cotton wool, sounding overly damped with a lack of precision and midrange insight.
The Slow filter reduced that effect dramatically while Fast was a default flat response. I hold my hands up here. I had to eat my words with these filters because my preference leaned towards the Slow filter which I actually found superior to Fast. The latter is supposed to be default and flat but I found Fast to be a touch edgy.
So, thumbs up to Audiolab. I never thought I would actually hear a usable filter on any piece of hi-fi equipment but, blow me down, Audiolab has created the very thing.
One important thing. Critical if you’re sound testing the 6000A and the DAC is significant to you. Make sure you properly review the amplifier with each and every filter. Cycle through each in turn and give each one time. Punching in any one of these filters will change the inherent character of the 6000A’s DAC. For example, if you talked to me about the 6000A having only listened to the Fast filter and I replied to you having only listened to the Slow filter, we’d effectively be talking about two different amps.
Hence, don’t judge the 6000A until you’ve heard all three filters. Listen to your Uncle Paul on this one.
Finally, I plugged in my reference headphones to listen to Satie via the internal headphone amplifier. While there may have been a limit on midrange extension, within the confines of the head amp’s performance envelope, the sound was admirable indeed offering plenty of refined detail on offer plus light and shade to add interest.
CONCLUSION
I listened to this amplifier for some time and realised that the basic presentation was supremely balanced in terms of how it delivered music to the ear. Some hi-fi components do one thing very well and if you’re looking at a budget component that can often be a fascinating experience because build budgets often preclude a generally good performance. The 6000A is one of those pieces of kit that does its best to do everything very well indeed.
Of course, it can’t. Not really. Money won’t let it. That doesn’t stop to trying, though.
In terms of ‘can’t’, what the 6000A doesn’t give you an extended dynamic reach. That high ceiling that higher-end amplifiers provide to allow the upper midrange to soar.
Now, some amplifiers in this price range will give you that. But then they will fall over very badly in other areas because too much emphasis has been placed upon that soaring thing for the build budget limits. So, for example, you may come across an amplifier that offers great midrange extension but the bass will be lacking. In other words, you go too far in one direction? You pay for it in another.
The 6000A doesn’t do that either. It never actually falls down. It never leaves you feeling, “Wow, it does this and this amazingly well but I wish it didn’t do that…” You won’t give that response to a 6000A listening session.
In short, the 6000A provides the perfect balance of performance to a build budget. It’s the perfect compromise. Every part of the sound envelope has been looked at and enhanced to the point when the money ran out. Then Audiolab stopped at that point.
Hence the 6000A squeezes every last penny of performance from your £599. If the designers had been told that the price was £649, they would have improved everything a bit more. For £699? Everything would have been improved a bit more still. You see? The 6000A is even handed, offers great sound and is one of the best value amplifiers on the market. If you want to hear how your money has been spent, buy a 6000A.
Bottom line? The Audiolab 6000A is better than you think.
AUDIOLAB 6000A INTEGRATED AMPLIFIER
Price £599
Website: www.audiolab.co.uk
TO BUY CLICK BELOW:
USA – https://amzn.to/383xoR3
EUROPE – https://amzn.to/3mMazW8
GOOD: confident bass, instrumental separation, upper midrange detail, balanced output
BAD: nothing
RATING: 9
[Don’t forget to check out my Facebook Group, The Audiophile Man: Hi-Fi & Music here: www.facebook.com/groups/theaudiophileman for exclusive postings, exclusive editorial and more!]
REFERENCE
Pro-Ject RPM3 Turntable
Tellurium Q & QED cabling
Blue Horizon Professional Rack System
Harmonic Resolution Systems Noise Reduction Components
All vinyl was cleaned using an Audio Desk’s Ultrasonic Pro Vinyl Cleaner
Thanks for your reply. can I use it with my AVR with HT bypass?
Thanks again.
Let me double check – also I think you can probably use the subwoofer (would you want to connect that to the 6000A?) with the Pre outs but let me talk to Audiolab first.
UPDATE: I’ve managed to get your question directly to the designer of the 6000A. Let’s see what he says, eh? 🙂
How would the 6000a work with Bz&W 606 s2
The pairing should be fine, Colin.
This is the core of my current kit, and I can offer that speaker positioning makes a noticeable difference. When I first received the 606s2 (replacing a wonderful pair of 1980s-era Heybrooks) they were in a difficult room and couldn‚Äôt be aimed ideally – they left a fair amount to be desired. After a recent move I was able to position them carefully in a better room, and now they are performing as I had originally hoped. I find the 606s2 pretty well-matched to the 6000A, but together they do expose poor quality source material.
David
Yes, want to use subwoofer the Amp. Thanks a lot. So nice to you. Waiting for your update.
Hi Goutom – this is from the designer, “When used in ‚ÄòIntegrated‚Äô mode, the Pre-Out is active and a subwoofer can indeed be connected. In a AV set-up, the front L/R from a processor can be connected to the Power-IN of the 6000A and the mode should then be set to ‚ÄòPre-Power‚Äô.”
Thank you so much Paul for the reply.
Another query arrived!! In the case of connecting PC using USB connection, what should be the good and low-cost solution? Which will support 24-bit/192kHz resolution and if possible DSD supported.
Hi Goutom – ok, so were looking at an external DAC now? What is your budget on this?
Hi Paul,
Sorry for the late reply.
As I want to use audiolab’s internal DAC, need to use some kind of USB to Optical / Coaxial converter that only converts the signal in Digital region, therefore, no role played by DAC. Which support up to 24-bit/192kHz resolution. Found some in amazon/eBay with very cheap about 21$ to 50$. What is your opinion?
Can you send me a link please?
Hi Pual,
links can’t be pest here,
Giving you the name:
DOUK Audio Mini USB to Optical Coaxial Converter XMOS 208 Digital Interface DSD DOP 192KHz
USBStreamer B
X1 USB to SPDIF Converter
Muse Audio HIFI USB PC DAC
Thanks.
Hi Goutom – so what exactly are you looking to connect the 6000A to?
Hi Paul,
I want to connect my Intel NUC computer through USB-Optical link with this amp.
Thanks.
Hi Goutom – to maintain sound quality and not lower the sonics you’ve gained via the 6000A, I would buy an external DAC with a USB port and attach your computer direct. Separating the DAC will enhance sound quality further.
Hi Paul. Thanks of all congrats for another amazing review.
Currently, I have a system driven by a Yamaha A-S501 which drives a pair of KEF Q350s. The source I listen to the most is my turntable, a Pro-ject 1 Xpression Carbon UKX. I’m getting a feeling that my amp is currently confining the rest of my units and I am considering to go for an Audiolab 6000a.
First of all, do you find it a good upgrade? Should I expect an important improvement indeed which should “worth” the money? For example, I was literally shocked when I first listened to my 1 Xpression in comparison to my previous Pro-ject Essential 3A. Should I expect a similar level of an upgrade?
My biggest concern regarding this amp is its wattage, which is a bit low. It’s almost 50% lower than my current Yamaha’s. Should I worry? In case I upgrade my speakers to large_ish floor standers (eg KEF R7, Tannoy XT8F or Fyne Audio F501) would the Audiolab be enough? Would it give decent signals as a decent pre-amp to a power-amp like a Roksan K3 or an Audiolab 8300XP? To be on the safe side regarding the power, should I go for a more powerful amp at this point, eg a Cambridge Audio CXA80 and a phono preamp? Which one would perform better?
Thanks beforehand for your time. Cheers!
Many thanks for your kind word AK. I would see the 6000A as a good upgrade, yes. You current speakers should perform fine and it depends how quickly you’re looking to upgrade your speakers and the specs of the new models. Floorstandars are often more efficient and easier to run, though and the three models you list should be ok. If you’re looking for more power above the 6000A though, I would seriously consider moving to a separate pre/power system.
Hi Paul, thanks for your response. Wouldn’t the Audiolab 6000a work well as a pre-amp in case I need more juice and go for a power-amp? Should I better go for a pre/power amp combo from scratch? If so, any advice for a specific model which shouldn’t cost much more than the Audiolab? Thanks!
Hi AK – sure, the 6000A would work well as a pre but it won’t be as good as a specialist pre. The 6000A is ideal if you use the amp for a good few years and then use it as a pre as part of a low-cost upgrade but if you’re thinking of upgrading a lot sooner then it might be a thought to leap frog the 6000A and go for the pre/power now. It depends on what you think is going to happen in your life over the next 5-10 years, where you want to be and how you see your system developing.
Hi Paul and thanks for another excellent review. I intend to buy the audiolab 6000A in order to get better sound. I presently have the Yamaha RN-602 driving a pair of of MA bronze 2 and I’m not happy with the result, too bright and not tonally balanced to my ears . What standmount speakers would you recommend with this amp in the 500-600 euro area? I mostly listen to tidal hifi and internet radio but I intend to add a cd player either a marantz cd 6006 or the Audiolab‚Äôs 6000CDT since I have a large cd collection and also a streamer the blue sound node 2i to help me with the streaming issue.. What do you think? Your input and opinion would be very much appreciated.Thank you so much
Hi Mike – thanks for your question. What’s your budget for the speakers?
Hy Paul, 500-600 Euro.
I would look at these: https://theaudiophileman.com/surf-stand-speakers-review-cabasse/
or these: https://theaudiophileman.com/concept-20/
Others to consider are the Dali Oberon 1, Mission QX2 and KEF 350s although I’ve yet to review the latter 3.
Hi,
Aren’t the concept 20 (or similarly sized speakers) too small for a 20sqm room?
And a quick side question: for the budget Ionut mentioned before, would you recommend bookshelf/standmount speakers or floor standing ones? To be used in a room as before, listening from the couch, not at the desk.
Thank you
It depends how much volume, bass, etc you wanted but I think the Concepts should perform well. I’d recommend a home demo to make sure in terms of your own expectations, though. Many retailers will allow home demos for with payment of a deposit. Here’s a (relatively) low cost stand-mount alternative: https://theaudiophileman.com/3050i-floorstander-review-q-acoustics/
Hello Paul and thank you very much for your suggestions. Do you have any thoughts about the Dynaudio’s Emit 20??..There’s a store here in Bucharest which has always good discounts on those, around 500 euro… Would they also be something to take into account with the audiolab 6000A? Which cd player would you consider between the marantz cd 6006 and the Audiolab‚Äôs 6000CDT to better match the Audiolab 6000A? And one more more thing. My listening room is approx 20X16 sq feet. Do you think the audiolab 6000A with it’s 50wpc is sufficient for this room? Thank you so much.
Hi Ionut – yes, the Emits are recommended and they should work well with the 6000A. Try and listen first, though. Your ears and expectations may be different to mine. I’d go for the 6000CDT. In terms of clarity, low noise and detail. Your room should be fine with this set up.
Hi,
What store in Bucharest?
Check Stereoplanet in Cotroceni, they run discounts on these from time to time…kind of obnoxious though not very client oriented
Thank you very much Paul!
Hi Paul, great review. Am mulling between the 6000a & a quad vena 11 mostly for the pre-amp section‚Äôs digital inputs – (I have a quad 909 pwr amp) and would appreciate any observations. I was however dismayed that your assessment of Bluetooth quality was with an Apple device which does not have aptX codec & the 6000 would revert to standard sbc with an inferior result. I think your readers with android 8 devices will experience better.
Kind regs. Ross
Agreed, that is an issue for Apple. Although I do use AAC – not a solution I know but it helps a bit. I was unable to use an Android phone but I did want to investigate the mechanics of Bluetooth on a phone. I was also able to compare and contrast my known device and the known Bluetooth sound quality from it with this amp and others so I hope that provided a semblance of comparison and at least a guide. The idea being to hear relevant differences/changes.
Hi Paul, how would you consider audiolab 6000 with regards to highs, warm bright or neutral? Thanks
Pretty neutral Ionut – because of the increased tonal balance (i.e. bass plays a larger part in the presentation) some might disagree but I see that as an illusory effect. The actual highs remain informative and open.