Turntable Review

EVO: A Carbon Debut Turntable From Pro-Ject

The latest in the ever-growing Debut series of turntables, Paul Rigby reviews this new design from the Austrian company

The Pro-Ject Debut series first appeared on the scene back in 1999. Via the distributor Henley Audio, there are, right now, three Debut turntables for sale – at least in the UK my home territory: the Debut Carbon DC at £299, the Debut Carbon RecordMaster Hi-Res at £649, a lifestyle design that focuses on its built-in analogue to digital convertor and this, the Debut EVO, the latest release from the Austrian turntable makers. It’s the most intriguing build I’ve seen in the line for some time. 

EVO Carbon Debut Turntable from Pro-Ject

The Carbon Debut EVO features a one-piece carbon fibre tonearm. This is the 8.6” carbon-fibre variety with sapphire bearings.

EVO Carbon Debut Turntable from Pro-Ject

There’s a steel platter which triggered a minor alarm when I first unpacked it because I feared the thing would ring like a bell when knocked with an available knuckle.

EVO Carbon Debut Turntable from Pro-Ject

TPE damping under the platter.

Not so, in fact. There’s some heavy-duty damping attached underneath the platter (which sits on a sub platter) in the form of a Thermo-Plastic Elastomer (TPE) damping ring. Knocking the platter with this in place drastically reduces any music-threatening vibration.

EVO Carbon Debut Turntable from Pro-Ject

TPE is also applied to the three, height-adjustable feet which are connected to suspension elements from the recently released X1, turntable.

EVO Carbon Debut Turntable from Pro-Ject



The electronic speed selection arrives in the form of a rocker switch which is hidden from view underneath the front-left portion of the plinth to keep the lines clean and aid aesthetics.

EVO Carbon Debut Turntable from Pro-Ject

The 33.33 and 45rpm selections are supplemented by 78rpm if you change the belt (supplied).

EVO Carbon Debut Turntable from Pro-Ject

A venerable Ortofon 2M Red cartridge (worth around £95) is included as standard. 

EVO Carbon Debut Turntable from Pro-Ject

There are nine finish options with this one, three in hand-painted high gloss covering red, white and black plus five varieties of hand-painted matte pastel colours spanning green, black, blue, yellow and white plus a walnut veneer. 

A hinged dust cover is supplied too.

Unpacking and construction was straight-forward. Just take it slow, follow the illustrated, colour instructions (first time I’ve seen Pro-Ject offer that approach to its instructions and it’s a welcome inclusion) and you’ll be fine. 

I was happy to see that Pro-Ject has bundled a separate set of Connect-IT E phono cables from its own range. I have reviewed these separately and like them a lot. It’s nice to see that the turntable can handle upgradable cabling too.

Spanning 415 x 113 x 320mm, the whole kit and caboodle weighs in at 6kg


I began with the 1975 album from The King Singers. Keep on Changing (EMI), mixing complex vocal harmonies, a soft rock tempo plus a host of instruments including guitars, drums, secondary percussion and a backing orchestra. 

EVO Carbon Debut Turntable from Pro-Ject

Rear-mounted power connector

I wanted to test a lower-priced, yet top quality turntable to address those who might be looking to upgrade. So I’m talking to owners of low-cost Fluance, Lenco and Audio-Technica designs. Around the £250 or lower mark, the best sounding turntable of the bunch is the Rega RP1 so I began with that.

If you’re looking to upgrade, is the EVO a viable option? Does the EVO improve overall sound and, if so, by how much? 

In short, the RP1 described all of the detail. It was all there. Nothing was left out. Imagine a country scene on a spring day. The RP1 showed you a photograph of the area. With the EVO, you were there. You could hear the rustle of the grass and the wind on your face. With the EVO, it added new sonic dimensions of realism.

So the RP1 tells you about the deep, resonant drum at the start of the track. The EVO tells you about its weight, the reverb that emanates from it and the bounce from the drum skin on the top. The RP1 tells you about a riffle of bells used as secondary percussion. The EVO introduced a shimmer to the bell effect, a lightness, a delicacy and again, that echo-based reverb that provided space.

Overall, the EVO was far more focused while the bank of strings offered weight, they were no longer just a tone they seemed to have body now. The precision allowed more detail to infuse the soundstage while the pace of the music picked up because that focus removed any tiny elements of drag. 

EVO Carbon Debut Turntable from Pro-Ject

The feet are adjustable for height

So, the EVO looks good as an upgrade from a low-cost turntable. Let’s up the ante shall we? Let’s see how the EVO handles bass and drive from a more expensive turntable, this time with a quality elliptical-stylus of the VM95E attached to Audio-Technica’s LP5x. I prefer the LP5x’s overall performance to the competing Fluance RT83, even though there’s a lot to like from the Fluance. So Fluence owners can take note from these comments here too.

EVO Carbon Debut Turntable from Pro-Ject

The sub-platter and pulley


The LP5x was all about muscle on this test. It provided bass weight, there was real punch here and a sense of impact while the mids and treble were admirable and supplied a good partnership with the lower frequencies but they couldn’t compete with the EVO.

The EVO offered a good sense of bass but the EVO also offered a better balanced bass response that worked with the mids instead of slightly dominating them. As for the mids themselves? The EVO had a better take of midrange detail offering the ear an extended dynamic reach. The LP5x rolled off at a point in the upper mids while the EVO just kept on going. 

The result was a tonal realism that you just don’t hear on lower cost turntables. A tonal realism that allowed you to better appreciate the art of the music instead of only an attractive musical noise. 

Next up was the EVO’s greatest challenge, the Rega RP3. This turntable should, by rights, be better than the Pro-Ject EVO in all areas. It’s around £100 more expensive. So how did the EVO cope?

The RP3 offered tremendous confidence in its overall presentation while the lower frequencies, as a whole, were a thing of beauty. The percussion wasn’t just tonally correct but organic in how it described each thwack of the drum. Vocals were focused while the upper mids had a real sense of precision. The effect was also to keep the music moving. The pace was steady and unfailing here. There was never any sense of drag. The song was sprightly and moved with a real bounce. 

Even so, the EVO not only held its own but managed to land a few blows against the RP3. Which was a complete surprise, I must add. That is, the soundstage from the EVO was more open and airy with a great sense of fragility and delicacy in the treble. Mids offered extended reverb tails while, despite the extra confidence and better quality lower frequencies from the RP3, I actually found that the EVO produced a better balance overall. 

I then moved onto something more dynamic and selected Rootmasters (Nina Walsh and Alex Paterson of The Orb). This is a 10” release, Push Once and the track Elephant Puddle.

The track was dominated by a cavernous sub bass which the Pro-Ject EVO tracked very well indeed. It also kept control of the effect to stop it swamping the mids. The upper frequency detail remained wholly intact, offering a host of information and keeping a sense of discipline across the soundstage.

The often aggressive frequencies were noted by the EVO. Guitar was in your face, percussion was dominant and vocals were distorted and cutting yet the EVO easily kept the entire track in control and added a balance that enabled the music to retain its inherent rhythm. In short, it rocked. And rocked efficiently but also with plenty of emotion.


The Pro-Ject Carbon EVO deserves to dominate the sub-£500 market. 

As for competing with more expensive and challenging designs like the Rega RP3? If you want to save yourself £100 then you will lose certain highlights yes but because of the EVO’s balanced presentation, many users won’t miss them. 

If you’re on a longer-range upgrade path, the EVO provides you with options. Is your ultimate upgrading aim a turntable around £1,000-£1,500? Are you saving slowly to reach that budget? Then the EVO might provide the better link in the upgrade chain. This will save you money early on but it will also provide a relatively long-term sonic solution until you can save the cash for that upgrade buy. With the EVO, there are no obvious sonic holes. There’s nothing amiss. In fact, you can see that Pro-Ject has spent its build budget wisely, focusing on all areas of the frequency spectrum, equally.

The Pro-Ject Carbon EVO is a winner. Buy with confidence.  


Price: £449

Tel: 01235 511166

Website: www.henleyaudio.co.uk


UK – https://amzn.to/3aWE57r

EUROPE – https://amzn.to/3jGXNrE

GOOD: balanced presentation, airy midrange, dynamic reach, detailed bass, price

BAD: nothing


[Don’t forget to check out my new Patreon Page at www.patreon.com/audiophileman, for exclusive postings, giveaways and more!]


Rega RP1 turntable

Rega RP3 turntable

Audio-Technica LP5x turntable

Trichord Dino phono amplifier

Audiolab 6000A amplifier

Spendor S3/5R speakers

Tellurium Q cabling

Blue Horizon Professional Rack System

Harmonic Resolution Systems Noise Reduction Components

CAD GC1 Ground Controls

Air Audio AC-2K Balanced Transformer

Russ Andrews RF Router Mk.II

You Might Also Like


  • Reply
    26th February 2021 at 3:20 pm

    Does the EVO scale up significantly with a more expensive cartridge? Something like a Denon 103D or Ortofon 2M Black.

    Thank you

    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      1st March 2021 at 11:02 am

      I would say that the EVO can handle a range of updates Scott. Cartridges and more.

  • Reply
    4th March 2021 at 1:38 pm

    Hi Paul,
    I’m looking to get back into vinyl after many years of CDs. I have a budget of up to £500 and after reading many reviews the EVO looks like the best option. I would welcome your advice on whether my amplifier is up to it, my current set-up is an Arcam Delta 60 amplifier, circa 1990, with B&W 625 speakers. Will the Delta 60 do justice to the EVO, or should I consider replacing it and getting a cheaper turntable such as the Rega RP 1?

    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      6th March 2021 at 2:08 pm

      Hi Steve – yes, an EVO would work well for you, I’m sure. The Delta is a fine amp but there’s better quality offerings available. The Audiolab 6000A is a good example, Rega’s Brio, Cyrus ONE and Heed Elixir are all recommended.

  • Reply
    18th March 2021 at 1:30 pm

    Hello Paul,

    Thanks for your review.
    I hesitate between the Carbon EVO and the Rega P1 for an upgrade… Which one sounds best in your opinion ? and which one is better for the long run (I do not plan to change soon after that) ?


    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      19th March 2021 at 4:43 pm

      Hi Marc – that would be: EVO and EVO.

      • Reply
        Marc Renou
        19th March 2021 at 5:57 pm

        Thanks Paul, it’s clear !

      • Reply
        Anthony F
        1st April 2021 at 2:39 pm

        Hi Paul,

        I’ve recently discovered your articles and, as a digital hi-fi enthusiast looking to get back into vinyl, have found your insights on turntables really informative. Thanks for your advice!

        I live in Australia and I’m looking to buy a decent turntable. Prices here are often heavily skewed by import costs and differing markups by brands, as well as how well the product is selling in our relatively small market. Occasionally, the lesser known brands here are heavily discounted.

        Both the Evo and P3 have a reasonable profile here. The Evo is about $A900 (Ortofon Red cartridge) and a P3 is about $A1250 (Elys 2). Discounting is fairly limited on these two models.

        But there is another contender I’m looking at, the Music Hall MMF5.3. This is currently heavily discounted, from about $1700 to $1250 (Ortofon 2M Blue cartridge with replaceable nude elliptical diamond stylus).

        In other words, it’s pretty much head to head with the P3 from a price perspective.

        Do you have any thoughts on the Music Hall, and based on this local market pricing, do you think it is the best option? Or is it a closer race than that. I would like the option to enhance the turntable down the track (your Funk Firm upgrade articles were a great read!), so also keen to buy something with an upgrade path.

        Any thoughts you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

        Kind regards,


        • Reply
          Paul Rigby
          2nd April 2021 at 11:49 am

          Many thanks for your kind words – for upgrading in mind, I’d look at the EVO to be honest. In fact, I’m planning an upgrade feature on this design in the future. So you’re start with a great turntable whose performance will only get better over time because of this inherent modularity.

  • Reply
    Anthony F
    8th April 2021 at 2:18 pm

    Thanks Paul. I’ll keep an eye out for the EVO upgrade article, looking forward to it!

  • Reply
    1st June 2021 at 8:29 pm

    Dear Paul,

    I am choosing a turntable for my family and I have studied a number of your reviews and articles on the subject. I very much appreciate your way of describing the sound characteristics, which is at the same time in-depth and understandable. Most of all, you write things in context, helping the layman to become more familiar with the subject. So thank you very much for your efforts and time!

    Based on several factors, I finally decided to purchase the “Carbon EVO”. I have a question, which you have probably already discussed somewhere or it is probably getting on your nerves, but I will ask you anyway..
    Could you please advise me on a suitable dedicated phono preamplifier for the “Carbon EVO” in the “Budget” alternative (what still makes sense yet) and “Optimum” up to 150€? Or possibly your own recommendation(s), thank you.

    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      2nd June 2021 at 9:35 am

      Thats very kind of you, Jaro. I’d look at the Schiit Mani as a great value/sounding item. This is an older review so ignore the stated price: https://theaudiophileman.com/schitt-mani/
      Otherwise, the Pro-Ject MM Box at around £69 from Amazon is a great budget option.

  • Reply
    Aravinda Wanniarachchi
    21st July 2021 at 12:35 pm

    Hi Paul,
    Thank for your reviews and the effort you put into making them.
    I own a Debut Carbon EVO and enjoying it very much. I was planning to upgrade to X2 but your another review got me thinking whether it is a better idea to invest in upgrading the EVO than going for something else.
    Love to hear your thoughts on this!!

    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      21st July 2021 at 1:58 pm

      Definitely one to consider, yes. I plan to look at EVO upgrades in the future. In fact, I need to give Pro-Ject a nudge on that one. I think they’ve forgotten to send the upgrade bits and pieces 🙂

  • Reply
    22nd July 2021 at 8:20 pm

    Hi Paul , thank for the evo review ! hope you will review soon the project debut pro ant edwards tt4 turntables !!
    Good wishes ! Dominique

    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      23rd July 2021 at 12:24 pm

      Thanks Dominique – and I’ve put in a request for the Pro, so finger’s crossed.

  • Reply
    27th July 2021 at 2:43 am

    Hi Paul, I am considering this turntable as an upgrade. Thank you very much for the review.

    Could you help me decipher the requirements for matching the cartridge and phono stage?
    To start with, I would like to use the Audiolab 6000A’s built-in phono stage for which the specs says:
    Input impedance: 47K//100pF

    The Ortofon 2M Red specs says:
    Recommended load resistance – 47 kOhm
    Recommended load capacitance – 150-300 pF

    Am I right thinking the capacitance mismatch here is an issue? I was hoping to delay a bit my purchase of a separate phono stage…
    Recommended load capacitance – 150-300 pF

    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      27th July 2021 at 2:37 pm

      Hi Antoine – the internal phono amp is fine to get by with but, more than the capacitance, the actual internal location will have a greater performance effect due to the inherent, associated leeching electronic noise from other internal components. That’s a larger factor. Hence, an external model will offer enhanced performance, just on those terms.
      All of that said. I wouldn’t worry too much about it. If cash is short and you need to wait a while, the internal model will be fine. To repeat though, for an internal model, I wouldn’t worry about the finer details.

  • Reply
    Giul Travelin
    21st August 2021 at 8:46 pm

    Hi Paul, I’ve been following your amazing reviews for a while and thanks for doing them. I’m about to get out of an AT LP120 and go up a step in search of better sounds. I’m in Brazil, so options and resources are limited. I currently have three options. Project T1 Sb, Project Ringo Starr Essential III and Carbon EVO. What could you indicate, advise on these options?

    • Reply
      Paul Rigby
      23rd August 2021 at 10:49 am

      The EVO would be my choice, of the three listed.

      • Reply
        Giuliano Martins
        23rd August 2021 at 4:08 pm

        Ok, Paul, I assumed that was the direction, learning a lot from their reviews and pertinent observations. Thanks!!!

    Leave a Reply

    By using this website you agree to accept our Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Share This
    %d bloggers like this: