The Article
EVO 4.2 Speakers From Wharfedale
14th May 2020
A relatively large stand-mounted design, Paul Rigby gets to grips with these 3-way designs
For a pair of stand mounters, as they sit there, on top of my speaker stands, the EVO 4.2 speakers look big. They look imposing. They, and let me make this absolutely clear…loom. They loom at you, folks. You walk into a room and you might think there’s a pair of intruders standing in your listening room. I don’t know how many times I reached for 999 during this review and then grabbed my heart in relief when I realised who they where.
That’s your EVO 4 series as a whole, really. A six-speaker series that uses technologies live and direct from the Elysian series of Wharfedale speakers.
Looking at the front, up top you’ll see an AMT tweeter, spanning 55 x 80mm. This Air Motion Transformer was created for the Elysian range and features a pleated diaphragm, driven by rows of magnets which force the pleats to contract and expand to the music. The waveform is created as the air is squeezed between them.
According to Wharefedale, this system offers an improved and finer sense of control. Much more accurate, says the company, than a bog-standard dome tweeter: larger bandwidth, higher speed, lower distortion…all that good stuff.
It’s nice to see a midrange unit in a modern speaker. I see so few of them nowadays. I miss them. This 50mm soft fabric-domed unit is linked to a damped rear chamber while the dome is itself damped by plasticiser and offers a bandwidth of 800Hz to 5kHz, backed by a high-flux magnet.
Way down into the bass regions, you’ll find a Kevlar-based unit, spanning 150mm. That material you can see in the centre (image above) is a woven aramid fibre.
Keep moving downwards and there’s a slot-loaded port that’s at the base of the unit. It’s easily missed by the eye so I’ve offered you an image here (below) so you can see what I’m babbling on about.
This SLPP (Slot Loaded Profiled Port) receives the lowest frequency energy, profiled, says the company to, “…equalise the high internal pressure to the low pressure in the room.”
The idea is to lower distortion and increase efficiency while reducing positioning issues.
The chassis itself, made from a multi-density wood sandwich, has been damped. The sandwich construction helps to reduce panel resonance while preventing sound leakage.
These 8 Ohms speakers offer a decent sensitivity rating of 90db so you’ll only need an amp upwards of around 25W to drive them.
Weighing in at 13.4kg each, the speakers each span 455 x 250 x 340mm.
So what do these house breakers sound like then?
SOUND QUALITY
I began with jazz-vocal from Morgana King’s 1973 Paramount LP, New Beginnings… and the track Like a Seed.
This period piece offers a fascinating arrangement because it provides a host of backing instruments of varied textures and range. Also, during the chorus, it’s almost as if the producer has said, “OK guys, just make lots of noise.” Hence, King hits the crescendos and never lets go, the harmony chorus tries its best to sound like slightly exasperated angelic angels while the backing sounds like a band interlude from The Muppet Show. It’s a pleasant racket and one that offers a challenge for any speakers that might meet the whole thing, head on.
And the EVO 4.2 speakers did just that.
You really have to talk bass from the off, with the speakers. There’s just no getting away from that frequency here.
Have you ever walked into a room and immediately sensed a feeling? Whether that might be an air of tension or one of joy? The room has an underlying tone. Whatever is going on in the room appears to rest upon that feeling?
Well, the 4.2s had that too and bass was that underlying feeling. Bass wasn’t dominant here. With the EVO 4.2s, it’s not like you’re listening to a pair of subwoofers. These speakers didn’t swamp the upper frequencies.
Nevertheless, bass was everywhere. It was infused in every part of the soundstage. It occupied the space like a furnished room. The wallpaper, the carpets, the soft furnishings? All bass. The lighter stuff? The upper frequencies and the finesse offered by these Wharfedales lay upon the bass, coating the 4.2 speakers.
So how did this manifest itself during play?
Well, it gave music a strength but also a real confidence. As I say, bass didn’t dominate to any great extreme here. It never bloomed or strayed too far from where it should be but it acted like the foundation of a house. The sonic structure was given authority by the bass. Bass enabled the music to roam and venture forth with more self assurance than you might normally hear.
It also provided a midrange composure that prevented any form of smearing, increasing focus and increasing tonal balance. King’s crescendos provided precision instead of what it normally wanted to do and that’s to blur out on the top end. Guitar strums provided detail and insight but also great control while bongo taps offered weight to each trike but also air and space during minor reverb.
Moving further upscale into the treble, cymbal hits and bell taps provided the delicacy you would hope for with reverb tails here and there to please but the bass focus added a sense of weight to each cymbal proving a certainty to each tap.
The low noise response was also welcome. During the cacophonous chorus sequences, what I’ve always thought were slightly frantic piano bashes turned out to by harp string plucks after all! Well, I never.
Hence, the bass and the treble provided true sonic bookends for a host of midband detail that entertained and delighted while the bass itself acted like a football coach, encouraging and influencing the rest of the music to greater heights.
I then turned to prog and Greenslade’s Time and Tide, on WEA from 1975.
As you might expect, the bass was a major part of this track. The deep and thumping bass was the heart of this song, providing an often dead-stop bass thud which was very effective but the Dave Greenslade keyboard sequences were significant too, offering a sweeping analogue, string-like tone that was rather gorgeous in its implementation while bass guitar provided an underlying rhythm to push the music onwards.
I did notice a slight bite in the midrange on rare occasions. An aggressive vocal snap would produce a slight midrange bark to accompany emphasis in delivery but that seemed to be a by-product of the accompanying precision from the speakers as a whole. Not a big deal and it didn’t overly concern me but it’s something to note during a demo.
What was surprising was the mobility and emotion from the lead vocal and the lead electric guitar. Bass never dragged upon these two contrasting sounds. They were both lively and light on their feet. Again, cymbal taps provided finesse but the bass added weight to this instrument. You got the feeling that a heavy piece of metal was being hit here.
CONCLUSION
In terms of physical bulk, the inherent design, that bass presence, the detail and authority, allied with a superb tonal balance and a sense of focused clarity, the EVO 4.2 speakers are wholly impressive. What I had to check twice here was the price point. For that price, the Wharfedale EVO 4.2 speaker’s offer incredible value for money.
WHARFEDALE EVO 4.2 SPEAKERS
Price: £599 (for a pair)
Tel: 01480 452561
Website: wharfedale.co.uk
TO BUY CLICK BELOW:
USA – https://amzn.to/35Wi99R
EUROPE – https://amzn.to/325hhi1
GOOD: bass authority, tonal balance, midband clarity, imaging, value for money
BAD: nothing
RATING: 8
[Don’t forget to check out my new Patreon Page at www.patreon.com/audiophileman, for exclusive postings, giveaways and more!]
REFERENCE
Tellurium Q cabling
Blue Horizon Professional Rack System
Harmonic Resolution Systems Noise Reduction Components
All vinyl was cleaned using an Audio Desk’s Ultrasonic Pro Vinyl Cleaner
Hello Paul, What a great review to read. Would a NAD Amp1 also be suitable for the wharfedale evo 4.2?
Yes, they should work well together, Jeroen.
Hey Paul, great insight into the purpose of the Paradigms. I have an old Nikko Alpha 220 Amp, and have no budget to replace it. Would you pair the Evo’s with the AMP. My source is Cambridge Audio 640c into a Liquid Spark in pre-amp mode. Thanks, great review.
Brian
Hi Brian – yes, your power amp should team up quite well with the EVOs.
Hey Paul, thanks so much for the review. I am torn between the MA silver 100s and Evo 4.2s. I like listening to classics (mainly piano concertos and some symphonies), rock and pop in that order. I will be pairing them with the Marantz 7005, would you be able to recommend between the two?
Also would audiolab 6000a be a better pair with either of them?
Tom
Hi Tom – I’d lean towards the 100s for classical et al. The 6000A – which I prefer – would be fine with those although if you want to spend around the ¬£1000 mark then something from Rega would be recommended too.
Paul I have A Naim 272 pre and a 250 dr power amp, I need a new speaker, do I need to spend thousands for my amp or would the evo be any good or the Martin Logan 5i or even the Q Acoustics 3030?
I’m currently in between speakers and am using a tiny pair of Q acoustics 2010 with good results which makes me think do I really need to spend 3k.
Hi Tony – that depends on your needs and requirements. The EVO will provide a good all round performance, certainly. I would urge a demo, if possible. A good dealer, who wants to establish an on-going relationship with you as a customer, will listen to requests for home demos. Especially in the current situation. I’d push for that.
Hi Paul, thanks for the review.
I wondered if there’s a similar review for the Evo 4.1 speakers?
I’m struggling to find any reviews for them anywhere which is a shame as they are a closer fit for me in terms of size and budget.
Many thanks. As for the 4.1s, I’m afraid I have yet to hear them, Chris.
Hi Paul, Thank you for your great review. I wonder for Wharfedale EVO speakers, do you recommend bi-wiring or single wire with a jumper? Or it does not really matter? Thank you.
I found single to work admirably, Griffin
Hi Paul
I know this might be a silly questions as named bookshelf speakers, but is it okay to place these on the left and right of a tv long and low stand. There is about 2 feet spare to the left and right of the tv for speakers to sit on top.
Instead of mounting on the stands?
Was looking at using the
CENTRE Wharfedale EVO 4.CS
FRONT Wharfedale EVO 4.2
REAR Wharfedale EVO 4.1
Would you by chance have a Yamaha AV amplifier suggestion ? 🙂
You can place speakers anywhere you fancy, Sean 🙂 As long as you have the amplifier to drive them properly. Placing them on proper stands helps to focus bass and prevents undue vibration while keeping the speakers at a consistent height maintains a sonic consistency but that all depends on budget and circumstances.
What’s your budget re. the AV?
Thanks that is Great about the placement as Head Height Tweeters when sitting.
Regards my Budget about in the middle. Was looking at the Yamaha RX-A4A as it has 110Watt @ 8 Ohms was confused with difference with RXA1080 but think was just the older model?
I can’t comment on the 4A Sean because I’ve yet to hear it. Personally I would go for the deal and grab the best you can find. Also check out Onkyo – I do like their amplifier modules.
Only a $187 saving for the old model.
Are the Onkyo more reliable than the Integra?
I have had multiple issues with the HDMI cards replaced in and then out of warranty for free, but then when repaired the ARC started having issues along with the Chrome Cast as would start working then a minute later stop 🙁
Hmm, I haven’t heard of issues with Onkyo – Denon, Marantz and even Yamaha yes but not Onkyo. Saying that, I would encourage you to do some extra research just to cover your back.
Hi, Paul I have a current setup of Yamaha AS500 Integrated with KEF Q100 Bookshelf. Would it be a upgrade SQ wise if I go for Wharfedale Evo with my current amp( 80watts /channel)? Further down the line if I upgrade the Amp.. What would you recommend that will give a considerable lift to my system. Keep up you good work, love your reviews.
P.S. Mostly listen to Rock music
Sure and what would be the amp budget?
Hi Paul,
For symphonic metal, mostly not so good recorded, the Wharfedale Evo 4.4 or MA Silver 300? I hate a too bright sound. Someone said look at the Wharfedale Linton but i don’t like that retro look. And i am more for floorstanders.
Both will be good – the extra bass weight on the EVOs might swing it, though.
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your answer. I take the wharfedale. They are also so beautiful.
Do you what will be a good amp for these speakers? Cambridge cxa81, arcam sa20 or schiit audio?
What’s your budget for the amp, Robert?