The Article
6000A Integrated Amplifier From Audiolab
1st July 2019
Adopting a traditional and solid form factor on the outside, Paul Rigby realises that the magic is occurring under the lid
The thing about the 6000A, when the aesthetics are considered, is that it looks like an integrated amplifier. Don’t dismiss that point. It’s actually critical to target sales. I say again, the 6000A looks like a traditional integrated amplifier. It looks safe. It looks steady and solid. It doesn’t try anything fancy. You would never accuse the chassis of ever emerging from an Italian design studio. There’s no chic fashion sense with this one. If you saw this box in the 80s, it would look rather racy, that’s for sure, but it wouldn’t look too out of place.
For some users, that is all they want. And that’s important. Weird and even slightly off-kilter designs can scare and make certain hi-fi fans feel uncomfortable. Even slightly conservative half-width amplifiers can be an issue for some.
The 6000A – at least on the outside – is the Mother’s Pride processed white loaf of amplifier design. You can see it for what it is at 30 paces. Again, I’m not damning this amp with faint praise when I say that. That’s not a bad thing. It’s a firm design choice.
Before I began the review of this box, I was comforted to know that the designer of the 6000A was also the same designer of the older 8300A. Jan Ertner took the basis of the latter to create the former which meant that hard won knowledge was now being refined and improved upon. There’s nothing worse than a single line of products that feature a host of designers who not only constantly reinvent the wheel but often make the same old mistakes over and over again (it’s happened many times in the past). Not here. So I already had a sense of confidence going into this one.
This is an amplifier but it features other components too. The ES9018 Sabre32 Reference DAC is one of those, featuring 32bit HyperStream architecture and Time Domain Jitter Eliminator. Again, this chip is not a foreign component. You’ll find it in the company’s M-DAC. Continuity again.
Connected to the DAC are the 6000A’s four digital inputs – two coaxial and two optical – which handle 24bit/192kHz. Tagged to these are user-selectable digital filters: Fast Roll-Off, Slow Roll-Off and Minimum Phase. I’ll say now that I normally hate these sort of things. Anything that takes me away from a pure, default, flat signal is an experience as near to abhorrent as I’m likely to find. That said, I’ll give them all a test in due course.
Streaming is also possible via Bluetooth (plus the now usual aptX codec).
A Class AB amplifier, that can also be used as a pre-amp and as a power amplifier too, the integrated mode of the design pumps out 50W per channel into 8 Ohms, the output stage of the discrete power amp circuits uses a CFB (Complementary Feedback) topology plus a meaty 200VA toroidal transformer followed by four 15000uF reservoir capacity (60000uF in total). The idea is to reduce the strain upon the amplifier and to maintain a sort of backup of power, ready to use.
Audiolab has included a phono stage for moving magnet phono cartridges – a JFET-based circuit with RIAA equalisation. A dedicated headphone amp with current-feedback circuitry is also included.
Spanning 445 x 65.5 x 300mm and weighing 7.8kg, the 6000A is available in a choice of silver or black.
SOUND QUALITY
I started with Mike Oldfield and his Platinum (Virgin) LP from 1979. I played Into the Wonderland, featuring vocals by Wendy Roberts. A sweet, beautifully melodic and slightly melancholic, low key ballad with a high-energy, rocking finish.
I suppose, if I were to describe the 6000A in one word, it would be confident. This amplifier is not shy, it doesn’t try to hide any aspect of its sound envelope. The 6000A will never die wondering. That is, the 6000A gives its all in the cause of making you happy.
The overall presentation from the Audiolab 6000A was balanced and balanced means you get to hear some bass. This is not always the case for mid-placed budget equipment. Bass is often sacrificed or at least trimmed to some extent. Even the best sub-£1,000 amplifiers out there love to trim bass. It’s a cost issue. That doesn’t happen with the 6000A.
The 6000A allows bass into the soundstage. That means that both the percussion and bass guitar were not only able to ground the music and stop it flapping in the wind but also offer a solid, rhythmic pace to the whole arrangement. That is, there was a sense of order here. The music flowed with an added, deeper groove. The structure was both solid and funky.
One of the persistent fears I have as a reviewer, from amplifiers designed at this price point, is frequency discipline. This is another reason that may sub-£1000 amplifiers are rather bass shy. Most of them can’t handle it. Too much of it, at any rate.
That is, there is a danger of allowing too much bass into the soundstage because it may create a warming feeling, leaking into the midrange and creating a sepia-like effect. Again, that never occurred with the 6000A. Frequency discipline was paramount so bass stayed put and never bloomed into the mids.
In fact, let’s pause for a moment here to dwell and emphasise this one feature. If I was going to pin one all-important factor for the success of the 6000A it would be tonal balance. In fact, you could ally tonal balance as being the killer feature of the 6000A. The headline. Tonal balance is the underlying strength of the 6000A. I really haven’t heard anything like it under £1,000.
The upper midrange was delightfully detailed and accurate although fragility and delicacy were not great priorities, I have to say. I never saw reverb tails of filigree lattice flowing from cymbal taps but this is a £599 amplifier we’re talking about here, not a £5,999 design. So no, don’t expect that but do expect to hear everything that a £599 amplifier can provide: complex and chaotic lead guitar with enough precision to make sense, wind instruments that feature a character and lightness of touch and a layered soundstage that revealed even shy instruments lurking at the rear of the mix.
Before I moved from vinyl, note that the built-in phono amplifier is a good one. An external model is better but the internal model will be fine for those of a budget. Buy an external model when you can, though.
I then turned to Bluetooth which I paired to my iPhone 8. Pairing is automatic. That is, you select Bluetooth as a source on the amplifier and the 6000A pops up on your Bluetooth screen on your phone. Painless and easy pairing. I played Marvin Gaye’s Mercy Mercy Me as a lossy file. Often, playing such a file in this way results in a bright and edgy play response but not here. The 6000A was able to calm any possible issues. So while the midrange was lacking insight, bass was hardly focused and treble was almost a non-entity, none of that was the 6000A’s fault. In fact, the 6000A made the best of a bad job, providing a perfectly listenable track without any nasty sonic responses. What I liked about the 6000A’s take on Bluetooth was the creation of a wide soundstage and, because lots of space was now on offer, the instrumental separation that also followed. Allowing each instrument within the mix to be presented on its own, adding to the complexity of the presentation.
Next up, I plugged in my Astell&Kern AK120 into the rear-mounted optical port and played Dire Straits’ So Far Away from their Brothers in Arms album. I liked the way the 6000A handled this 24bit/88.2kHz track because the track was mastered with excessive peak limiting creating a compressed sound. The low noise aspect of the 6000A, the balanced and controlling nature of the upper frequencies and the solid bass foundation allowed this track to be broadcast in a mature and stable fashion. To such an extent that the compressed element was no longer a real issue.
Playing the restful piano tinklings of Erik Satie at the same resolution was a relaxing and enjoyable experience. The potentially chaotic resonance of the piano was handled well by the 6000A in terms of control while the nuanced nature of the keys and pedals from the Satie piano was transcribed with both ease and insight to give the performance a sense of delicacy alongside that sense of authority.
I then took a quick listen at the range of DAC-related filters available within the unit. In the 6000A’s manual, the Phase filter is talked about as if the resultant sound resembled analogue but I had to disagree. The presentation emerged from cotton wool, sounding overly damped with a lack of precision and midrange insight.
The Slow filter reduced that effect dramatically while Fast was a default flat response. I hold my hands up here. I had to eat my words with these filters because my preference leaned towards the Slow filter which I actually found superior to Fast. The latter is supposed to be default and flat but I found Fast to be a touch edgy.
So, thumbs up to Audiolab. I never thought I would actually hear a usable filter on any piece of hi-fi equipment but, blow me down, Audiolab has created the very thing.
One important thing. Critical if you’re sound testing the 6000A and the DAC is significant to you. Make sure you properly review the amplifier with each and every filter. Cycle through each in turn and give each one time. Punching in any one of these filters will change the inherent character of the 6000A’s DAC. For example, if you talked to me about the 6000A having only listened to the Fast filter and I replied to you having only listened to the Slow filter, we’d effectively be talking about two different amps.
Hence, don’t judge the 6000A until you’ve heard all three filters. Listen to your Uncle Paul on this one.
Finally, I plugged in my reference headphones to listen to Satie via the internal headphone amplifier. While there may have been a limit on midrange extension, within the confines of the head amp’s performance envelope, the sound was admirable indeed offering plenty of refined detail on offer plus light and shade to add interest.
CONCLUSION
I listened to this amplifier for some time and realised that the basic presentation was supremely balanced in terms of how it delivered music to the ear. Some hi-fi components do one thing very well and if you’re looking at a budget component that can often be a fascinating experience because build budgets often preclude a generally good performance. The 6000A is one of those pieces of kit that does its best to do everything very well indeed.
Of course, it can’t. Not really. Money won’t let it. That doesn’t stop to trying, though.
In terms of ‘can’t’, what the 6000A doesn’t give you an extended dynamic reach. That high ceiling that higher-end amplifiers provide to allow the upper midrange to soar.
Now, some amplifiers in this price range will give you that. But then they will fall over very badly in other areas because too much emphasis has been placed upon that soaring thing for the build budget limits. So, for example, you may come across an amplifier that offers great midrange extension but the bass will be lacking. In other words, you go too far in one direction? You pay for it in another.
The 6000A doesn’t do that either. It never actually falls down. It never leaves you feeling, “Wow, it does this and this amazingly well but I wish it didn’t do that…” You won’t give that response to a 6000A listening session.
In short, the 6000A provides the perfect balance of performance to a build budget. It’s the perfect compromise. Every part of the sound envelope has been looked at and enhanced to the point when the money ran out. Then Audiolab stopped at that point.
Hence the 6000A squeezes every last penny of performance from your £599. If the designers had been told that the price was £649, they would have improved everything a bit more. For £699? Everything would have been improved a bit more still. You see? The 6000A is even handed, offers great sound and is one of the best value amplifiers on the market. If you want to hear how your money has been spent, buy a 6000A.
Bottom line? The Audiolab 6000A is better than you think.
AUDIOLAB 6000A INTEGRATED AMPLIFIER
Price £599
Website: www.audiolab.co.uk
TO BUY CLICK BELOW:
USA – https://amzn.to/383xoR3
EUROPE – https://amzn.to/3mMazW8
GOOD: confident bass, instrumental separation, upper midrange detail, balanced output
BAD: nothing
RATING: 9
[Don’t forget to check out my Facebook Group, The Audiophile Man: Hi-Fi & Music here: www.facebook.com/groups/theaudiophileman for exclusive postings, exclusive editorial and more!]
REFERENCE
Pro-Ject RPM3 Turntable
Tellurium Q & QED cabling
Blue Horizon Professional Rack System
Harmonic Resolution Systems Noise Reduction Components
All vinyl was cleaned using an Audio Desk’s Ultrasonic Pro Vinyl Cleaner
Thanks very much Paul.
Hello Paul, I decided to postpone buying a new amp-the audiolab 6000A- for the time being. I’ll do it maybe next year, I’ll stick with the yamaha rn-602 until then. Meanwhile I still have to upgrade replace my standmounters. Presently I have the monitor audio bronze 2 and they sound very bright and tonally unbalanced to my ears in combination with the Yamaha Rn-602 receiver. I listen to a lot of classic rock and this combination really sucks with this type of music. Since you reviewed the yamaha rn-602 which speakers would better match this receiver that tends IMO to be also on the bright side like the MA Bronze 2?? The budget is still around 500-600 euros or a max of 550 pounds i guess. Would the Q Acoustics Concept 20 still be a good option with the rn-602? Or the wharfedale diamond 225, dynaudios emit M20, Klipsch RP-600M-they get rave reviews- PSB Alpha P5??? Any opinion suggestion would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much
Hi Ionut – I would look at the Yamaha – the probable source of the issue – rather than multiplying the error by buying overly warm speakers which will be no good when you upgrade to the 6000A. Hence, I would keep your cash, save your money and wait for the 6000A.
Thanks Paul. Since it seems I can’t help myself and I’m overly tired with the combination of yamaha and MA Bronze 2, I was thinking of selling the MA Bronze and give it a try to either the Acoustics Concept 20 or the Cabasse surf speakers to match the rn-602 till next year when I’ll upgrade to the 6000A. You recommended those to compliment the 6000A anyway. The cabasse are 190 pounds brand new here in bucharest and the concepts 345 pounds:
https://www.avstore.ro/boxe/cabasse-surf-negru/
https://www.avstore.ro/boxe/q-acoustics-concept-20/
Or I can just refrain myself stick with the same system for another year and save for even better speakers to match the 6000A. Tough call since I’m kinda fed up with the sound I’ve been getting for almost 2 years. Jazz instrumental even classical is ok tolerable but rock and blues really sucks.
Hi Ionut. Just read your comments and thought I’d comment.
I have an RN602 paired with Concept 20s (on their dedicated stands). Although the combination is decent (especially for the cost of the RN602 and it’s features), I`ve been feeling that I might not be getting the best out of speakers. I’ve been considering the new Marantz PM7000 to replace the Yamaha, but I`ve also been looking at hooking up an Allo Digione Signature to a new amp, and the 6000A is on my shortlist. The Marantz is fully equipped like the Yamaha, but I’m wondering if the Digione/6000A might give better results for similar cost. It’s hard to decide. I know auditioning is the way to go, but I don’t think any dealer will be able to compare the two options I’m considering. Paul, could you possibly point me in the right direction ?
Hi Andy, the 6000A would be my preference, yes.
Thanks Paul, I am very tempted to go the Digione/6000a route. Looking at reviews, it seems the Digione Signature (with Shanti PSU) is a very good streamer, I assume the DAC in the 6000a will do it a reasonable amount of justice. I’m obviously looking for a kind of “mid range” upgrade to improve on the Yamaha amp that I currently use, and don’t intend to spend a fortune. However, if I want to push the boat out a little further (now or in the future), would an external DAC provide a decent sonic upgrade ? If so, could you suggest something I should consider ?
Hi Andy – yep, an external DAC would lift the sonic level even higher. Even something like the low cost iFi DAC I used in the 6000A review would be a good purchase.
How does this stack up against the Cyrus One? Torn between the two…
Hi Nick – I like the Cyrus, I actually think it’s under-rated by much of the media and I’m not sure why. That said, I think the Audiolab has the edge because it retains a tonal balance but loses nothing in terms of detail and clarity.
HI Paul, thank you for 6000A informative review. My seup is as follows: BW 805 (circa 2001 vintage); NAD 7050 integrated Amp.; a Linux nano PC running MinimServer as the source; the room size is 5 x 5 mtrs approx.; and listen mostly classical music.
I’m not satisfied. The bass lacks power and there is not enough detail. I’ve been reading about the 6000A and the Rega Brio. Both get very good reviews, the 6000A considered more accurate and the Brio more musical. You qualify it as balanced.
After reading your review it seems that the 6000A would be better for me. What do you think about the combination Audiolab 6000A / BW 805? Will 50W RMS be enough to control the 805s?
Another issue is that the NAD comes with WiFi, and presentes the NAD to the UPnP controller (BubbleUPnP) as a “D7050…” renderer.
Could you recommend a device that connects to the network and outputs digital audio, to be connected to the 6000A coaxial or optical ports? .
The nano PC is located on the same piece of forniture where the amp would be. This opens the alternative to connect a PC USB port, via a converter, to the 6000A optical or coaxial port. Can you suggest one?
Many thanks.
Hi Carlos – the 6000a would drive the speakers ok…but only just. I’d probably look at a pre-amp/power amp combo to offer more security in that area and more confidence in terms of presentation.
I wouldn’t recommend connecting a coax to a USB port via any sort of convertor. Doing so would degrade the sound right at that point, negating any sonic benefit you may gain from your quality hifi components. I would look at a specialist streamer.
Hi Paul. Thanks for the advise. I’ll direct my search in the direction you suggest.
Hello Paul. Considering that my room is 18×14 sq feet do you think the Q Acoustics 3050i floor standers would be a better option than the different stand mounters mentioned in previous posts? Thank you.
Hi ionut – that depends on you, to be honest. The stand-mounters will fill your room but if you want commanding bass at high volumes and all of that then, yes, go for the floor standers. It depends on your expectations and your sonic needs.
Hi Paul,
I have a old cd player with RCA output only. Is it fare enough to connect it one of the input or need a DAC for more sound quality. If it is then what will be the solution?
Hi Goutom – yes, just connect the CD player to one of the Aux inputs on the rear and you’ll be fine.
Thanks Paul.
Hello Paul – I am considering replacing my Audiolab 8000S with the 6000A. I subscribe to Tidal HiFi streaming and would ideally like to take best advantage of the MQA Masters files. I am aware that the 6000A is NOT currently MQA Certified, and so it can play MQA streams up to 24bit/96kHz only (rather than the full MQA rendering at 192kHz) using the Tidal Desktop app. I have a dedicated PC soundcard installed with optical I/O terminal so will use this source to connect to the 6000A to stream Hi-Res from Tidal. Do you see any problems with this?
Hi Pete – seems a shame to waste that 192 option. Also, if you did go for that, you’d want the best platform to do it on. Hence, I’d go for a dedicated DAC, an external model and I’d avoid the PC sound card because it will be so full of veiling noise that it will negate going up to 192 in the first place.
It’s truly very difficult in this busy life to listen news on TV, thus I just use internet for that
reason, and get the newest news.