The Article
REGA PLANAR 1: The Best Budget Turntable…In The World…Ever?
30th July 2017
The Rega Planar 1 has been out and about for a little while and so Paul Rigby has been able to have a good long look at the thing before giving it a thorough review. He does more than that, though. He asks if potential buyers should bother buying one at all or hunt around for a second hand P1?
One of the legends of the budget turntable genre, Rega’s introductory turntable design, the P1, was first introduced in 2005 with a MDF platter. The P1 was upgraded in 2010 with a Phenolic resin platter. Finally, the design was the subject of a major design revamp with a host of changes – which will be listed below – along with a name tweak to become the Planar 1.
The large list of design changes promises an improvement in sound. I was and still am a fan of the earlier P1 but I wanted to see how the new changes have been implemented in practical and in sound terms. Hence, I decided to review the new Planar 1 while also comparing it to the older P1 model, in this case the 2010 release.
As the Planar 1 is sold in greater and greater numbers, the quantity of older P1 decks available for second hand purchase will increase too. This factor is important, especially for the budget-conscious user. Saying that, though, actually scouting around eBay, I noticed that the original P1 is still being sold at the full price of £248 via ‘Buy it Now’ deals while auctioned decks include a recent model for just under £200. Other sites, such as Gumtree, have models available for between £170 and £200. As you can see, the Rega kit tends to hold its price pretty well which is a good thing for buyers, in the long run, who might want to offer their turntable for sale as second hand items.
So, should you look at buying second hand and so save a few pounds? Is it worth the savings? And just how good is the new Planar 1? Does the new turntable enhance sound quality at all? If so, by how much? Enough to shell out for the full retail value?
One of the more appealing aspects of Rega’s design policy is the lack of fuss. The new Planar 1 – like the RP1 – is minimalistic in terms of general design. Actually, the new Planar 1 takes that notion to the extreme because it moves the power switch from the upper front left of the platter. The new switch is still around the front left area but you can locate it underneath the platter instead to enhance the clean lines of the Planar 1’s piano black finish: it’s far more stylish than the textured vinyl of the original P1.
Both turntables include a built-in tonearm and cartridge. Both are set up correctly from the factory. Rega’s P1/Planar 1 are both very easy to set up and both score over the immediate competition in terms of the amount of steps and parts you have to play with. This is a ‘good thing’. Firstly, it reduces set-up time but also frustration. The latter is minor but definitely there on some competing designs. It irritates the hell out of me whenever I have to review a piece of hi-fi and, before I can power up, I have to attach the right set of prongs to the plug. And I’m given three sets to choose from too. If you’re not used to this sort of thing, this one simple and relatively minor task can cause some tension as the prongs often do not easily fit the first time or require an odd orientation. It’s a silly thing in the grand scheme of this turntable but I still applaud Rega for giving me a ready-made plug!
Another speedy set up point is the tonearm’s rear-mounted weight. There to assist you in setting up the cartridge downforce. Competing decks ask you to push the weight onto the rear of the arm and then, using an appropriate tool, set the correct downforce. Although I can do this task in my sleep, many beginners have never done such a thing in their entire lives and the prospect can be scary, never mind that they might even have to spend more cash on the required tool. Rega cuts this step out. You push the tonearm weight onto the rear of the arm and push it until it reaches a ‘stop’ point ridge. When the weight cannot move any further, you’re done. That’s it. The weight is at the correct point and you can move on. A blessing for any beginner.
To get you up and running, Rega also places a brief step-by-step set of instructions actually on the platter. You don’t have to open plastic bags to locate the manual, find the page and the instructions you need. Rega has them right in front of you, in plain view. Removing the manual from the packaging is a genius idea. Manuals, for beginners, are scary and should be shot at birth. They trigger uneasy memories in the user of receiving manuals spanning 4,000 pages over seven hard-backed, leather-bound volumes…the last time they bought a DVD player (I exaggerate, yes, but that’s how it can feel). The Planar 1 gets you up and running in nine bullet points spanning three square inches of white card plus two tiny inset diagrams.
Yes you could have extra detail showing alternative views of the turntable, more blow-up diagrams and more hand-holding text. There’s a balance to these things, though and I believe that assuming the user has basic intelligence is one of those things. Not talking to the user as if they are five years old is a nice attitude to take. There is enough information on this Quick Start card to get you going.
Changes have been made to the tonearm itself which has been designed specifically for this turntable and will only ever be seen on this turntable. The new RB110 includes a brand new security latch to keep a tight hold of the arm when it’s ‘in dock’, as it where. This latch is superior to the original. The new arm also does away with anti-skate requirements, using an opposing magnet system instead, built into the turntable. This just adds to the saving of time but also any demands for ugly bits of sticky-out wiring supporting ugly lengths of fishing wire dangling unsightly bobbly bits of lead weight. The P1 had a simple anti-skate setting arrangement but removing anti-skate totally also removes yet more worries from the beginner. Talk to any turntable beginner about anti-skate and most will think it involves lots of ice somewhere or other. I did talk to Rega about this change and they were concerned that a lot of users were not setting the anti-skate on their new decks because they either didn’t read the original manual properly, didn’t understand anti-skate or were afraid that, by altering this area, they might “break the turntable”. Rega’s new system removes the headache while automatically applying a correct setting for the arm and cartridge.
The Rega does have one contentious element and I’ve scratched the ol’chin on this one point. It related to speed changing.
To move from 33 ⅓ to 45rpm and back again, both the newer Planar 1 and older P1 ask you to lift the platter to expose the motor and belt and then you have to gently transfer the belt that ultimately rotates the platter onto a different groove of the pulley. It takes a few seconds, is painless and you quickly get used to it but it’s not as convenient as flipping a switch on to of the platter. This, I grant you, might concern a few beginners and might irritate a few others.
Finishing my chin scratching, I decided that Rega is correct to relegate speed changes to belt moving. Why? Because changing the speed has nothing to do with the final sound quality. That is, adding a convenient switch will not enhance sound quality. The other changes to the Planar 1 either add convenience and do not affect sound quality or just enhance sound quality without compromising convenience.
Adding a speed switch to the plinth of the Planar 1 would actually compromise sound quality.
Think about it, this is a £248-priced turntable. That, in the grand scheme of things, is not a lot when you consider that Rega has to push out the door an easy to use, audiophile, non-Crosley-type, design that sounds great. Of the set build budget, therefore, every penny counts. An automatic speed changer will eat up a chunk of the build budget meaning that sound quality will suffer. Why? Well, because something else would have to go. Or the quality if something else would have to be reduced to free up the extra cash required. Also, such speed changes can introduce noise into the system, degrading sound quality.
Other improvements over the older P1 include a brand new 24V, low noise, synchronous motor (the first budget design from Rega to include one). It arrives with a new motor PCB and aluminium pulley offering low noise and better speed stability too. The plinth is also new…as is the 23mm, higher mass, phenolic platter. The bearing it sits on has been re-designed. It’s based on brass but includes a better fit, removing stress on the bearing itself whilst minimising the transfer of potential energy. Rega even has a patent pending on this one. Even the feet have been enhanced and changed, designed originally for the Rega Planar 3 and brought over for the Planar 1. The turntable arrives with an excellent Rega Carbon cartridge.
SOUND QUALITY
I decided to use Connie Francis’ original pressing Sings Bacharach and David (MGM) from 1968 in which she fronts a large orchestra. From the off, I could tell that the Planar 1 offered a reduced noise environment. Noise masks musical information. Remove it and more music comes though. That’s what I was hearing here.
Secondly was the lead vocal which was far more focused than the P1. The P1 suffered from a touch more noise which meant that mids on the vocal smeared a little producing a touch of stridency on crescendos. I say this as a comparison to the Planar 1 only. In comparison to many other budgets turntables the P1 is sonically superior. Nevertheless, the Planar 1 provided a clearer and very stable lead vocal performance that not only helped clarity but Francis’ diction.
Midrange, in general terms, provided a smooth output with both trumpet and the string section flowing with a sense of elegance and ease. Piano was both rich and full with a new air of lightness about the notes which now seemed to dance politely across the wide and broad soundstage.
The stereo image was a busy area. Behind the Francis vocal was a tight guitar strum, thought most of the song that sat alongside a series of cymbal taps. Both the guitar and cymbals provided new information and detail with, for the cymbals, open and delicate treble response with a characterful guitar sound. Character was also what the bass provided in terms of the bowed double bass and the firm yet detailed lower frequencies.
Next was a more contemporary pressing and the high energy sounds of Die Werkpiloten via Germany’s Vinyl on Demand label from 2012.
This drum heavy LP offered gloriously tight, punchy but not dry percussive bass. It’s all very well having a strong bass but if it lacks any sense of the organic then it tends to lose emotion (unless that’s the artist’s intention, of course). If there’s one thing that annoys me is when a piece of hi-fi makes the decision for you. The Planar 1 offered strength and a bass impact that was potent and convincing but always with a sense of the emotional.
Vocals also provided emotion, giving texture to the lyrics with midrange subtlety and nuance that, added to vocal emphasis, provided a sense of performance to the song. Again, the music provided a humanistic feel. Budget gear can often strip this important element from its design. The Planar, for the price, had it in spades.
The low noise aspect of the turntable meant that manic electric guitar sequences provided more detail and precision while, on the other end of the scale, rather shy synth runs were ‘visible’ to the ear and where never masked by any threats of blooming bass or smearing mids. This also occurred with the bass guitar which, on this LP, could be rather recessed into the depth of the mix. The low noise allowed the ear to follow the bass guitar throughout the songs without any trouble.
CONCLUSION
If you can find one cheap enough, grab a RP1, it sounds excellent and will serve you well. That said, if you can save up for a new Planar 1, go for that instead. The more I used the turntable, the more I realised that this is not just a budget turntable, it’s the ultimate budget turntable. It does everything that a budget turntable can do and should do in terms of its consideration towards the customer but also its respect for the ears of the same in its search for top quality sound for the asking price.
In those terms, the Planar 1 sets itself up as the standard which every other budget turntable seeks to emulate. From the installation to the final play, the Rega Planar 1 is not just outstanding, it has actually changed the nature of the market at this level. On this basis, I have no choice but to award it the highest rating I have in my armoury, the ultra-rare Golden Groovy. I have details of almost 250 products reviewed on this site. This is only the fourth time that I’ve awarded such a rating. That’s how good this turntable is…
REGA PLANAR 1 TURNTABLE
Price: £248
Website: www.rega.co.uk
TO BUY CLICK BELOW:
USA – https://amzn.to/34OXcP2
EUROPE – https://amzn.to/3kQiMIs
GOOD: general design, aesthetics, set-up, overall sound quality, price
BAD: nothing
SCORE: 10
REFERENCE
Rega RP1 turntable
Trichord Dino phono amplifier
Rega Brio-R amplifier
Spendor S3/5R2 speakers
Tellurium Q cables
Harmonic Resolution Systems Noise Reduction Components
All vinyl was cleaned using Audio Desk’s Ultrasonic Pro Vinyl Cleaner
Thanks Paul – there was no easy way to email from the Rega site.
Dear Mr. Rigby,
Thank you for this detailed review. I am about to purchase my very first turntable but I am having a hard time deciding between two extremes:
– to buy Rega Planar 3, defend it from my girlfriend and be fine with it and happily upgrade the rest of my system in the future.
– to buy Rega Planar 1 to get a feel for it and few years later if I feel the need, upgrade to higher model.
The thing is I am not sure how these TTs would go with my amplifier (SONY TA-F461R) and speakers (RFT B9271). If I buy the Rega 3, there’s no way I am spending more on the rest of the system in the next year or two. Also mainly listen to black metal (but not exclusively) so the advantage of the better TT might be lost on a majority of my records recorded in a garage 🙂
It would be ideal to have a listen beforehand (as I wonder how much do the turntables differ in sound quality) but I don’t have this option so I am in the mercy of the internet. With the Rega Planar 1, wouldn’t it be better to just stick to CDs? Sorry, but I really have no idea 🙂
Best regards,
Tomas
Hi Tomas
There’s a few issues here but, reading your text and your circumstances, I would recommend a Planar 1. Once you’ve bought that, it will then show up all the issues of the amp and speakers, I’m afraid. Both are adequate but not much more. That said, the Planar 1 will be a definite improvement so it will be a positive start. Next up will be the amp, then the speakers. When you have a budget for either or both, give me a shout. In terms of sound quality, you will get far more from a decent budget turntable than a decent CD player.
Thank you so much Paul! Your advice us much appreciated. All the best in the new year.
Regards,
Tomas
How would you compare the Rega P1 to the Pro-Ject Carbon Espirit DC? I’m trying to decide between the two. Seems to be tonearm and platter differences mainly? Cartridge as well.
I have yet to compare both decks, Glenn but the Esprit is almost ¬£200 more expensive than the Rega so I would expect the Pro-Ject to be superior in terms of sonics, knowing Pro-Ject as I do. Can’t confirm – just an educated guess.
Hi Mr Rigby, I read your review with interest. I was thinking about replacing my turntable by a decent one. My father gave me his Technics SLB2 who is a nice one and work fine but i would like to go further with my records playing. I ‘ve been looking for some vintage TT but prices are getting higher and higher those days and I’m a bit afraid to get one of those and having bad issues a few time after, being obliged to spend again some money to fix it. So i thought about the REGA RP1. I saw one on the french market – https://www.boulanger.com/ref/1089870 – but, as you can see on the announce,it’s only written ‘REGA PLANAR’ instead of REGA RPxx. It’s discribed as a RP1 but with some upgrades (like the glass platter, a different belt) for only few Euros more. It seems to me to be a good deal but I couldn’t find any information on the web and I would like your opinion about it. Do you think a REGA could lead me to a higher level compare to my Technics (especially this perticular model) ?
Also, my set up is an Aka√Ø AM2400 for the amp and speakers are TEAC SE 300 (from the early 80’s,a bit rare but good stuff here…), what do you think ?
Thanks for you enlightments and pardon my english,
Best regards from France, Thomas.
Hi Thomas – your English is fine, don’t worry about that 🙂 My first ever turntable was a SLB2, so I’m familiar with its pros and cons, shall we say 🙂 The Planar 1 is sonically superior to the RP1 and I would recommend a new deck, if you can spare the cash, because it will provide you with legal protection in terms of delivery condition and in case of problems in the future. Also, everything will be new and tested and will work fine for a long time, if treated with care.
Once you get the turntable, upgrade the amp next, then the speakers. When you are ready to do that, come back to me and let’s talk.
Hi and thanks for the reply 🙂 So, i really think i’m going for this Planar 1. Sorry but i still have a (stupid) question : do you think the difference will be clearly noticeable with my actual set up (amp and speakers) because if I get this turntable, i won’t change it before a year or two (need to save some budget for works in my house) ?
Thanks again for your precious reviews (also on vinyl engine ;)) and your advices,
best regards,
Thomas
Hi Thomas – in my opinion, yes, you’ll hear the difference. When you upgrade the amp, you’ll hear further differences and so on. The turntable is the most important bit, though, so this upgrade is the most important.
Ok, many thanx again, Paul !! 🙂
PS, sorry for the double comments, I thought the 1st one did not work….
Regards
Thomas
Hi Paul,
Glad I picked up a Planar one last week as my first ever tt. Hooked it up to a Pioneer A-A6 amp with built in phono input. Speakers are Dynaudio 140s and a System Audio SubElectro 200 Sub. Right off the bat, I find the overall sould pleasant, but the highs are lacking definition, sounds like the cymbal strokes are spread too thin. I have also ordered a Schiit Mani preamp, which hasnt arrived yet.
My questions:
1) Does the cartridge improve over the 30-40 hour long burnin like people say?
2) Will adding the Schiit Mani to the setup add any significant changes? Have you tested this model yourself?
3) If I consider a cartridge upgrade to the Planar 1, would a Nagaoka MP 110 be an easy and worthy upgrade? Would I need to align such a cartridge before use or is that going to be plug and play like the default Carbon cartridge on the Planar 1?
Writing in cos you seem to take interest and reply to folks 🙂 appreciate your contribution to all of us new guys 🙂
best
jeevan
Hi Jeevan – thanks for your questions.
Nice system – never been a big fan of Pioneer amps, gotta admit. They try hard and they are fine but there’s better out there.
To your questions, yes the cart will burn in so give it a bit of time before you come to any decisions and then come and talk to me if you have an issue that is not addressed below…
Yes, any external phono amp will improve sonics – this should offer a big difference. The Mani is excellent, here is my review: https://theaudiophileman.com/schitt-mani/
The MP110 is a quality cart but I think the Goldring E3 is the standard in this price point. It’s a bit cheaper too.
Come back to me if you need more help. And thanks for your kind words 🙂
Thanks for writing back Paul. The Schiit Mani arrived today. It is a stellar performer. The sound has improved and is almost CD like now. The earlier problems were clearly because of the phono input on the pioneer. Maybe it was meant for a different type of cartridge?
Thanks for the suggestion on the Goldring E3. Rsearch more about that now. But the supplied rega Carbon is quite adequate and great sounding, I feel.. for now (lol).
Tried a bunch of fresh records today, And they all sounded extremely satisfying with good bass mids and treble extensions. I shall follow you and check in with questions and advice for sure. Many thanks! You are fantastic. Im gonna go see if you have a youtube channel.
Knowledgable and kind folks like you make the vinyl world go around 🙂
Cheers!
Thanks Jeevan – I do have a [quiet] YouTube channel but it’s, well, not really a proper channel. It’s more an archive for some video tests I did to accompany several reviews. They’re not great quality – experimenting in public can be a painful experience! Having learnt through many mistakes, I’m saving up for better equipment and will relaunch when I rejig my set-up.
Hi, Paul. Firstly, many thanks for that insightful review. It is really helpful.
Secondly, I was looking for a REGA PLANAR 2 review but I can’t find any. Would you be so kind to tell me the main differences between the PLANAR 1 and PLANAR 2 and if it worth the try to buy the expensive one?
I know that your motto is to buy the best you could and, also, “start from the beggining” but maybe with the difference in price between the two I can buy the PLANAR 1 and afford another thing with the difference but I want to make sure that I am not letting the oportunity to buy the PLANAR 2 as I don’t intent to renew the set-up for a long time (and I live in Argentina :))
Thanks for all your help and consideration
Cheers,
Hi Emliano – the differences are quite significant including a new arm and platter, so definitely worth the extra cash. If you’re looking for the long term, then I’d recommend going for the ‘2’ and upgrading the rest when you can. That said, if money is very tight and will be for a while then got for the ‘1’ and buy the rest now. I can help with the other components if you want to let me know your budget.
Hi Paul,
I’ve been looking for the Planar 1 or the Planar 2. The amp I have at te moment is an old Sony amp and the speakers are B&W 685 (not S2). I am planning of replacing the amp too. With the speakers in mind will the Planar 2 sound better than the Planar 1 (the chain is as strong as the weakest link).
Cheers
Hi Joran – no matter what the rest of the chain is, the source should be the best bit in it. The source is critical as it’s the bit that retrieves the information. This info can’t suddenly reappear just because you’ve got a superb amp or speakers, for example. They just make the limited info you already have sound as good as they possibly can. Hence, I’d go for the Rega 2. Then I’d advise upgrading the rest, as and when you can.
Hi Paul, Thanks for the advice. I’ve ordered the Planar 2! I will connect to a HQ Phono preamp 220 (el cheapo). I’m thinking of purchasing the Rega Mini A2D any time soon to replace it (good idea?).
What do you think? Do I need to upgrade the B&W’s? I’ve read some good reviews on these speakers. The Receiver is a Sony STR-DG300. Perhaps that should be the next component to upgrade?
Hi Joran – yes, the Mini A2D is a good idea. I wouldn’t waste your money – if your budget can take it – grab the Fono straight away. I would go for the amp next, then the speakers, yes. When you’re ready, come back and we can talk about that.
Hi Paul,
Excellent article! I am considering switching to a Rega P1 from a Pro-Ject RPM 1.3 Genie MK I (the central bearing is now worn out) do you think I will see an improvement in sound quality?
Hi Phillip – yes I do but I think the improvements might not be enough to warrant the upgrade. You might be better to maximise any savings you have by leaping upwards to a Rega Planar 3. Either that or look towards an external phono amp – do you have an external mode?
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your earlier advice. We went to try a Planer1 and came home with the 2. I have a new question (sorry) – the Carbon cartridge – is it comical or elliptical? Could you suggest an upgrade – Bias2 perhaps? The Carbon does not seem to have the output that my Lenox deck had so volume needs upping a bit. Very pleased with it so far – thanks again.
Brian
Hi Brian, not a problem. Always here to help.
Yep you need an elliptical upgrade. A Bias2 is a good idea. A Goldring E3 is another option: https://theaudiophileman.com/goldring-e3/
Let me know how you get on.
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your advice, I have a basic set up, but it works well for me, Onkyo A9030 amp with built in phono stage and monitor studio bronze 2 speakers
It all depends on your outlook in hifi terms and where you want to go with your hardware.
As your old turntable is faltering and you need to move fast then, if cash is tight, a Planar 1 would be an excellent purchase. Then grab an external phono amp when you have the cash. If you’re on a planned upgrade path and that’s part of a longer-term strategy then a move to a Planar 3 now might be a good thing. An external phono amp would be essential too, when funds allow.
Thanks Paul. The Rega upgrade might be the way to go – belt, mat and Bias2 for, I think, ¬£98 ish.
So – after some agonising – I finally settled for the Elys2. Wycombe Sound Gallery could not have been more helpful (bought deck from them last week). We had a discussion about various options, including the upgrade route. I sit here now listening to Pink Floyd building some wall and I‚Äôm sure I‚Äôm hearing things I‚Äôve not heard before! I think, at this price point, which I know most would say is the budget end of the market, that the Elys suits my system well enough (Denon 880R into Castle Chester‚Äôs bi-wired). Thanks again for your most helpful reviews and the time you have taken with my enquiries.
Regards,
Brian
No problem Brian – glad to hear that you’re happy with your choice.