The Article
REGA PLANAR 1: The Best Budget Turntable…In The World…Ever?
30th July 2017
The Rega Planar 1 has been out and about for a little while and so Paul Rigby has been able to have a good long look at the thing before giving it a thorough review. He does more than that, though. He asks if potential buyers should bother buying one at all or hunt around for a second hand P1?
One of the legends of the budget turntable genre, Rega’s introductory turntable design, the P1, was first introduced in 2005 with a MDF platter. The P1 was upgraded in 2010 with a Phenolic resin platter. Finally, the design was the subject of a major design revamp with a host of changes – which will be listed below – along with a name tweak to become the Planar 1.
The large list of design changes promises an improvement in sound. I was and still am a fan of the earlier P1 but I wanted to see how the new changes have been implemented in practical and in sound terms. Hence, I decided to review the new Planar 1 while also comparing it to the older P1 model, in this case the 2010 release.
As the Planar 1 is sold in greater and greater numbers, the quantity of older P1 decks available for second hand purchase will increase too. This factor is important, especially for the budget-conscious user. Saying that, though, actually scouting around eBay, I noticed that the original P1 is still being sold at the full price of £248 via ‘Buy it Now’ deals while auctioned decks include a recent model for just under £200. Other sites, such as Gumtree, have models available for between £170 and £200. As you can see, the Rega kit tends to hold its price pretty well which is a good thing for buyers, in the long run, who might want to offer their turntable for sale as second hand items.
So, should you look at buying second hand and so save a few pounds? Is it worth the savings? And just how good is the new Planar 1? Does the new turntable enhance sound quality at all? If so, by how much? Enough to shell out for the full retail value?
One of the more appealing aspects of Rega’s design policy is the lack of fuss. The new Planar 1 – like the RP1 – is minimalistic in terms of general design. Actually, the new Planar 1 takes that notion to the extreme because it moves the power switch from the upper front left of the platter. The new switch is still around the front left area but you can locate it underneath the platter instead to enhance the clean lines of the Planar 1’s piano black finish: it’s far more stylish than the textured vinyl of the original P1.
Both turntables include a built-in tonearm and cartridge. Both are set up correctly from the factory. Rega’s P1/Planar 1 are both very easy to set up and both score over the immediate competition in terms of the amount of steps and parts you have to play with. This is a ‘good thing’. Firstly, it reduces set-up time but also frustration. The latter is minor but definitely there on some competing designs. It irritates the hell out of me whenever I have to review a piece of hi-fi and, before I can power up, I have to attach the right set of prongs to the plug. And I’m given three sets to choose from too. If you’re not used to this sort of thing, this one simple and relatively minor task can cause some tension as the prongs often do not easily fit the first time or require an odd orientation. It’s a silly thing in the grand scheme of this turntable but I still applaud Rega for giving me a ready-made plug!
Another speedy set up point is the tonearm’s rear-mounted weight. There to assist you in setting up the cartridge downforce. Competing decks ask you to push the weight onto the rear of the arm and then, using an appropriate tool, set the correct downforce. Although I can do this task in my sleep, many beginners have never done such a thing in their entire lives and the prospect can be scary, never mind that they might even have to spend more cash on the required tool. Rega cuts this step out. You push the tonearm weight onto the rear of the arm and push it until it reaches a ‘stop’ point ridge. When the weight cannot move any further, you’re done. That’s it. The weight is at the correct point and you can move on. A blessing for any beginner.
To get you up and running, Rega also places a brief step-by-step set of instructions actually on the platter. You don’t have to open plastic bags to locate the manual, find the page and the instructions you need. Rega has them right in front of you, in plain view. Removing the manual from the packaging is a genius idea. Manuals, for beginners, are scary and should be shot at birth. They trigger uneasy memories in the user of receiving manuals spanning 4,000 pages over seven hard-backed, leather-bound volumes…the last time they bought a DVD player (I exaggerate, yes, but that’s how it can feel). The Planar 1 gets you up and running in nine bullet points spanning three square inches of white card plus two tiny inset diagrams.
Yes you could have extra detail showing alternative views of the turntable, more blow-up diagrams and more hand-holding text. There’s a balance to these things, though and I believe that assuming the user has basic intelligence is one of those things. Not talking to the user as if they are five years old is a nice attitude to take. There is enough information on this Quick Start card to get you going.
Changes have been made to the tonearm itself which has been designed specifically for this turntable and will only ever be seen on this turntable. The new RB110 includes a brand new security latch to keep a tight hold of the arm when it’s ‘in dock’, as it where. This latch is superior to the original. The new arm also does away with anti-skate requirements, using an opposing magnet system instead, built into the turntable. This just adds to the saving of time but also any demands for ugly bits of sticky-out wiring supporting ugly lengths of fishing wire dangling unsightly bobbly bits of lead weight. The P1 had a simple anti-skate setting arrangement but removing anti-skate totally also removes yet more worries from the beginner. Talk to any turntable beginner about anti-skate and most will think it involves lots of ice somewhere or other. I did talk to Rega about this change and they were concerned that a lot of users were not setting the anti-skate on their new decks because they either didn’t read the original manual properly, didn’t understand anti-skate or were afraid that, by altering this area, they might “break the turntable”. Rega’s new system removes the headache while automatically applying a correct setting for the arm and cartridge.
The Rega does have one contentious element and I’ve scratched the ol’chin on this one point. It related to speed changing.
To move from 33 ⅓ to 45rpm and back again, both the newer Planar 1 and older P1 ask you to lift the platter to expose the motor and belt and then you have to gently transfer the belt that ultimately rotates the platter onto a different groove of the pulley. It takes a few seconds, is painless and you quickly get used to it but it’s not as convenient as flipping a switch on to of the platter. This, I grant you, might concern a few beginners and might irritate a few others.
Finishing my chin scratching, I decided that Rega is correct to relegate speed changes to belt moving. Why? Because changing the speed has nothing to do with the final sound quality. That is, adding a convenient switch will not enhance sound quality. The other changes to the Planar 1 either add convenience and do not affect sound quality or just enhance sound quality without compromising convenience.
Adding a speed switch to the plinth of the Planar 1 would actually compromise sound quality.
Think about it, this is a £248-priced turntable. That, in the grand scheme of things, is not a lot when you consider that Rega has to push out the door an easy to use, audiophile, non-Crosley-type, design that sounds great. Of the set build budget, therefore, every penny counts. An automatic speed changer will eat up a chunk of the build budget meaning that sound quality will suffer. Why? Well, because something else would have to go. Or the quality if something else would have to be reduced to free up the extra cash required. Also, such speed changes can introduce noise into the system, degrading sound quality.
Other improvements over the older P1 include a brand new 24V, low noise, synchronous motor (the first budget design from Rega to include one). It arrives with a new motor PCB and aluminium pulley offering low noise and better speed stability too. The plinth is also new…as is the 23mm, higher mass, phenolic platter. The bearing it sits on has been re-designed. It’s based on brass but includes a better fit, removing stress on the bearing itself whilst minimising the transfer of potential energy. Rega even has a patent pending on this one. Even the feet have been enhanced and changed, designed originally for the Rega Planar 3 and brought over for the Planar 1. The turntable arrives with an excellent Rega Carbon cartridge.
SOUND QUALITY
I decided to use Connie Francis’ original pressing Sings Bacharach and David (MGM) from 1968 in which she fronts a large orchestra. From the off, I could tell that the Planar 1 offered a reduced noise environment. Noise masks musical information. Remove it and more music comes though. That’s what I was hearing here.
Secondly was the lead vocal which was far more focused than the P1. The P1 suffered from a touch more noise which meant that mids on the vocal smeared a little producing a touch of stridency on crescendos. I say this as a comparison to the Planar 1 only. In comparison to many other budgets turntables the P1 is sonically superior. Nevertheless, the Planar 1 provided a clearer and very stable lead vocal performance that not only helped clarity but Francis’ diction.
Midrange, in general terms, provided a smooth output with both trumpet and the string section flowing with a sense of elegance and ease. Piano was both rich and full with a new air of lightness about the notes which now seemed to dance politely across the wide and broad soundstage.
The stereo image was a busy area. Behind the Francis vocal was a tight guitar strum, thought most of the song that sat alongside a series of cymbal taps. Both the guitar and cymbals provided new information and detail with, for the cymbals, open and delicate treble response with a characterful guitar sound. Character was also what the bass provided in terms of the bowed double bass and the firm yet detailed lower frequencies.
Next was a more contemporary pressing and the high energy sounds of Die Werkpiloten via Germany’s Vinyl on Demand label from 2012.
This drum heavy LP offered gloriously tight, punchy but not dry percussive bass. It’s all very well having a strong bass but if it lacks any sense of the organic then it tends to lose emotion (unless that’s the artist’s intention, of course). If there’s one thing that annoys me is when a piece of hi-fi makes the decision for you. The Planar 1 offered strength and a bass impact that was potent and convincing but always with a sense of the emotional.
Vocals also provided emotion, giving texture to the lyrics with midrange subtlety and nuance that, added to vocal emphasis, provided a sense of performance to the song. Again, the music provided a humanistic feel. Budget gear can often strip this important element from its design. The Planar, for the price, had it in spades.
The low noise aspect of the turntable meant that manic electric guitar sequences provided more detail and precision while, on the other end of the scale, rather shy synth runs were ‘visible’ to the ear and where never masked by any threats of blooming bass or smearing mids. This also occurred with the bass guitar which, on this LP, could be rather recessed into the depth of the mix. The low noise allowed the ear to follow the bass guitar throughout the songs without any trouble.
CONCLUSION
If you can find one cheap enough, grab a RP1, it sounds excellent and will serve you well. That said, if you can save up for a new Planar 1, go for that instead. The more I used the turntable, the more I realised that this is not just a budget turntable, it’s the ultimate budget turntable. It does everything that a budget turntable can do and should do in terms of its consideration towards the customer but also its respect for the ears of the same in its search for top quality sound for the asking price.
In those terms, the Planar 1 sets itself up as the standard which every other budget turntable seeks to emulate. From the installation to the final play, the Rega Planar 1 is not just outstanding, it has actually changed the nature of the market at this level. On this basis, I have no choice but to award it the highest rating I have in my armoury, the ultra-rare Golden Groovy. I have details of almost 250 products reviewed on this site. This is only the fourth time that I’ve awarded such a rating. That’s how good this turntable is…
REGA PLANAR 1 TURNTABLE
Price: £248
Website: www.rega.co.uk
TO BUY CLICK BELOW:
USA – https://amzn.to/34OXcP2
EUROPE – https://amzn.to/3kQiMIs
GOOD: general design, aesthetics, set-up, overall sound quality, price
BAD: nothing
SCORE: 10
REFERENCE
Rega RP1 turntable
Trichord Dino phono amplifier
Rega Brio-R amplifier
Spendor S3/5R2 speakers
Tellurium Q cables
Harmonic Resolution Systems Noise Reduction Components
All vinyl was cleaned using Audio Desk’s Ultrasonic Pro Vinyl Cleaner
Many thanks Paul. Do you think it’s worthwhile replacing the Cambridge Audios? Although they are more than 10 years old they still perform pretty well I think. And I’m not sure I would get much better products in that price range (around 500/600 euros each). One local shop has recommended I go for the Rega Apollo CD player and couple it with the Rega Brio amp. What do you think?
Yes, both of the Regas would be good buys for you, Ignacio.
I just boutgh this turntable and, as you suggested, Rega Fono Mini A2D. Thank you.
I am a little concerned abou plastic hinges. Should I take off the cover every time I play music? My guess is they will broke if I open and close the cover a few dozen times.
Hi Calin – thanks for your question. I always recommend removing a lid completely and removing the hinges permanently from any turntable. They are great at generating harmful vibration. Instead, when you finish your play, carefully place the detached lid back on the chassis and then remove again and store temporarily before play once more.
Hi Paul— Thank you for the in-depth review! I’ve enjoyed mine for two years now and reading about all of these design choices makes me appreciate it that much more. I had a few questions that I’ve had trouble finding reliable answers to across the interwebs:
1) How often should I replace the Rega belt (I have the upgraded white one) and the cartridge? I’m guessing I’ve listened to around 600-700 hours worth of music on it. I keep my records clean, brush them each time before playing, and remove dust from the stylus with one of those sticky pad things. I haven’t heard any reduction in sound quality, but as I’m sure it’s gradual, I may just not be noticing it. Is there a good rule of thumb to follow?
2) If I were to replace the cartridge, do you have any recommendations for this tone arm? Reading about the anti-skate measures put in place for this Rega Carbon gives me pause about just picking up any cartridge and I’m wondering if I should just stick to the original if I’ve been satisfied. I’m mostly listening classic rock (Fleetwood, Dylan, etc.), mid-century jazz (Blue Note, Brubeck, etc.) and some classical (Beethoven, Gershwin, etc.) So anything that helps with staging and clarity and bringing out the darker, more sonorous parts of the music would appeal to me.
Thank you again! Last question: what’s the best way to support your efforts on this page. I’ve spent a few hours now perusing and want to make sure you’re supported in this awesome endeavor.
Hi Phillip – thanks for your kind words. For the belt replacement? Rega suggests every five years. For the cartridge? The featured Carbon includes a spherical stylus tip – you could upgrade it to a cartridge with an elliptical stylus tip to increase sonic detail. One example of that is this Audio-Technica example: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Audio-Technica-At95e-Phonograph-Cartridge/dp/B004NRVUMI.
Thank you very much for the offer of support. I did consider the Patreon route but thought that mode a bit cold. I wanted to provide a specialised service for those who kindly support me so I’m planning a new area – although it might be a while away yet. Before I get there, I’d like to launch a separate YouTube channel – a bit of a ‘talking head’-type advice/issues/help thing, keeping the reviews and the like for the site here. After that, I hope to open a service for a sort of subscriber-type approach. More info on that soon!
Many thanks for the advice Paul. As I’m thinking of getting a Planar 3 in about 4 months, do you really think it necessary to replace my Cambridge Audio 640 C Azur to take full advantage of the new turntable? I have been recommended the Rega Brio but I don’t know to what extent replacing the amp is really indispensable.
Hi Ignacio – it all depends on your budget, really. If you can afford the Brio then I’d advise getting it because you’ll experience enhanced sound. The Azur is a good amp, though, if funds are tight.
Hi Paul,
I’m in the market for a new turntable, replacing a Numark el cheapo. Currently using a Onkyo tx nr626 and klipsh reference surround system. I’m undecided on the p1 vs p2 debate. In your opinion, do you suspect on my system that the price difference is worth the quality increase?
Get the best you can afford, Jason – it does make a difference. The Onkyo has a decent amp section so you should hear a benefit. That said, whatever you buy, please also consider an external phono amp to get the most from your turntable. It’ll be a big upgrade on the low cost internal model offered by the Onkyo.
Thank you. I appreciate the input. I decided to go with the P1 and a pre-amp to stay in my budget. I’m not familiar with phono amps and what makes one better than another. Can you recommend one in the 120-150 range?
Hi Jason – sure, Rega’s own Fono for around ¬£90 is a good buy.
Many thanks for the reply, Paul. Very useful. Actually, it seems that the amplifier some dealers recommend with the Planar 3 is not the Brio but the Elex R which retails at about 1300 euros, a bit too much for my budget I’m af’raid. Also, i suppose the big change will not be brought so much by the change in the amp but by moving from the Planar 1 to the Planar 3.
Hi Ignacio – No problem.
I’d have to disagree with those dealers you mentioned. I reckon the Elex will unbalance a Rega 3-fronted system. The Brio is preferred.
Hi Paul
Stumbled across your website whilst researching a new turntable, what a find! Hats off to you for creating such a well informed website.
I currently have a Dansette Bermuda MK2 which I love for all sorts of reasons. But, I’m now thinking of getting separates.
Having read this review and all the subsequent questions, the system I have in mind is the Rega 1, Rega Fono Mini A2D, Cambridge Audio Topaz AM10 and some Q Acoustics Concept 20’s. A quick search on the internet brings this in at around the ¬£800 mark.
In your opinion, would increasing my budget to say around £1000 offer me a much better listening experience? And if so, which component would you upgrade?
Probably worth mentioning that aesthetically speaking, the AM10 is the least attractive part of this package to me.
Thanks
Lee
Very kind of you to say so, Lee and welcome to the site.
Nothing wrong with a Dansette but separates will certainly help your sonics. If you added cash to your budget then I’d upgrade the turntable, stretch that to ¬£300 and buy either a Rega Planar 3 or a Pro-Ject RPM 3.
Thanks for that Paul. Very helpful.
I think I’m going to go for the Planar 3.
I’m struggling to get to like the look of the AM10. What are your thought’s on pairing the P3 with a Yamaha R-N602 receiver (with or without pre-amp)?
I quite like the option of having A and B speakers on the Yahama as it means I can feed some garden speakers as well. I also prefer the look of the Yahama but ultimately it’s sound quality I’m after.
Thanks again
Lee (apologies if this is a duplicated post, I replied earlier but can’t remember if I submitted it or not)
Hi Lee – I sense a certain amount of conflict in your requirements here. Let’s go though a few points. If you want the convenience of a multiroom system where you can feed sound into your garden or elsewhere, I’d recommend a specialist system like a Sonos or similar. That way, you save money on extras like cables, there’s no cable mess to trip over, you can move the Sonos here and there without any siting issues, etc, etc. For outside use, the Sonos is good enough too in terms of sound.
Also, if vinyl-based sound quality is a priority then I would avoid any sort of receiver. It’s packed with veiling noise-related kit for a 2-channel vinyl system. You’re best with a purer chain which is what a 2-channel amp is all about. Receivers are great for surround sound and all-in-one convenience. They offer great value if you want a lot of features for not a great deal of cash.
Hence, I’d advise having a good ol’think over a coffee and a choccie biccie and consider what you really want from your sound in terms of sound quality but also ease of use plus any lifestyle demands. There’s no right or wrong decisions here but, whatever direction you decide to take, you should really buy the right tools for the job to maximise your budget.
And now I’ve just discovered the Denon PMA800NE :/
I know you haven’t yet reviewed this but do you much about it?
Hi Paul
Thanks again for your reply. You’re right, there is conflict in what I said, story of my life 🙂
The garden speaker setup was really just an added bonus if the yamaha was any good as a standalone amp, forgetting its receiver features.
I already have a full house Sonos setup. The garden side of that has been on the list of things to do for a while. I was merely thinking, put a Sonos Connect into one of the spare inputs on the amp/receiver and then the speakers connected to “B” on the receiver could feed the garden.
I was also thinking, I could use the output on whichever amp I eventually choose, to feed the “analogue in” on the Sonos Connect so that, should I feel the need, I can enjoy my vinyl around the house. However, first and foremost, my primary listening position for vinyl will be in front of the turntable/amp with a decent hifi setup.
That might make the picture a little clearer.
Do you have any thoughts on the Denon PMA800NE?
Am I being too hard on the AM10? :/
As an aside, I already have a Denon AVR-2400H for my TV setup with a Monitor Audio MASS 5.1 speaker system. And as I said previously, my current vinyl listening is limited to my Dansette.
Thanks
Lee
Hi Lee – you mean this one? https://theaudiophileman.com/800ne-amp-cd-network-denon-news/ I have yet to get too close to it but I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that it’s a decent/solid unit. That said, in audiophile terms, for the ¬£450 it costs (and if you have that cash I’d encourage you to push it to ¬£600), I could point you in a more audiophile direction. If you have a Sonos and a Denon AVR-2400H then I see your TV and multi-room needs covered for now. I’d plough your budget into a specialist vinyl setup if vinyl is at the front of your mind.
Hi Paul
Yes that’s the Denon I was referring to. I actually found it for ¬£328, which is one of the reasons I gave it consideration. If it was ¬£450 I probably wouldn’t have given it a second thought and ¬£600 for the amp is definitley pushing it just a bit too far right now.
I understand that having a separate phono stage is preferential but my thinking with the Denon was that I could used the integrated phono stage in the interim and then fork out the extra ¬£90 for the Rega Fono later down the line, when I have the opportunity to sneak it in 🙂
All that said, I have looked a bit closer at the AM10 and I’m coming round to how it looks a bit more. At first glance I thought it looked plasticcy but now I’ve taken a closer look, it looks more like a brushed steel which I’m okay with. Another selling point of the AM10 is that it’s low profile.
I do still prefer the look of the Denon. I like that it doesn’t have a digital display. I also note that it does have an “analogue” mode to bypass any digital wizardry. A further, yet superficial point, is that it would match with my existing Denon AVR.
In summary, I’m pretty much settled on the Planar 3 and Concept 20 speakers. It’s just the amp that’s up in the air.
I can probably guess the answer to this is that the AM10 plus a Rega Fono will give better sound, in audiophile terms, than the Denon?
Hi Lee – yes, the Denon is a worthy option and you’re fine to wait on the external phono amp. Also consider the new low cost Mitchell & Johnson integrated too (just been released and I will review it soon). But yes, best sound will be heard from a 2-channel amp (of whatever type, AM10 is good) and external phono.
Ended up getting the Planar 3, Denon PMA-800NE and Monitor Audio Bronze 2. Rega Fono to be added at a later date.
Really enjoying this set up so far.
I thought I was settled on the Concept 20’s but went along and tested those and a pair of the Bronze 2’s. The bronzes just pinched it for me.
Thanks again for all the advice Paul.
Good stuff – glad I could be of help and I hope you enjoy your new system!
Hi Paul
I’m new to the vinyl world and came across your website. I love the work you have done, and thank you for your multiple reviews and comments.
I’m still debating over the Planar 1 or the Planar 2, which would go along with a Rega fono mini A2D (all to be purchased in North America). I was planning to use them with a Sonos Play:5 that I currently own (with the jack input). I prefer to spend my budget on the turntable itself and eventually upgrade to an amp speaker system when budget will allow it.
I am trying to understand what would be the biggest weaknesses of such setup vs amp passive speakers. Will the listening experience be annihilated by using the Sonos instead of a ‘regular’ amp speaker system?
Thank you!
Thanks for your question, Frank. The Sonos is a great lifestyle system and does the whole multiroom thing very well indeed. To achieve that, though, and to remain valid in price terms it does compromise on sonic quality. For vinyl play, the best approach is a dedicated 2-channel system (i.e. turntable, amp, speakers). The Sonos can’t compete on those terms. That said, for now, as part of an ongoing upgrade process, by all means start off with the Sonos. A good quality turntable is a must, though. The source is the most important part of a vinyl system. This is where the information is taken, right from the grooves. The best turntable you can afford is paramount here. Then worry about the amp and speakers later. You won’t hear the full glory of the turntable in the Sonos chain but that sound quality will improve as you gradually upgrade the amp and speakers.
Thank you for such quick feedback!
In your opinion, would it be useful to spend an additional 500-600 CAD (300-350 GBP) on an amp speakers combo instead of the Sonos? At this price point, are there any products you would recommend? Or would it be better to wait a little longer until the budget allows a better amp speakers combo?
Thank you!
No problem, Frank and yes, I would – you could try the Cambridge AM10 Topaz amp (¬£200) and Q Acoustics 3020s speakers.
Again, thank you for your recommendations, I really appreciate it!
🙂
Many thanks for your advice Paul, really appreciate it. As said before, going for the Planar 3 and the Brio amp may overstretch my budget a bit. Instead, I was thinking of just upgrading my phono preamp. Currently, I have a C. Audio 551p phono preamp hooked to the Azur 640 C. Do you think this would be enough for the Planar 3 or would you recommend going for something like the Rega Fono MM MK3?
Hi Ignacio – yes, the Rega Fono MM would be a big improvement. I‚Äôd recommend it if you‚Äôre budget allows.
Thanks a lot for the quick reply, Paul. How does the Rega compare to the Schitt Mani (which I think you reviewed) or the C. Audio CP2?
The Mani is excellent, Ignacio, but the higher cost of the Rega adds a bit of extra sound quality. If cash is tight, though, the Mani is a top quality choice. The Cambridge unit is also excellent but the same comments apply.