The Article
AT-LP140XP Turntable From Audio-Technica
23rd September 2019
Described as a DJ turntable, the new AT-LP140XP deck arrives with the new AT-XP3 cartridge. Paul Rigby reviews both
Audio-Technica’s ATLP120USB (£289) is a popular target for those looking to purchase a budget direct drive turntable. It offers Technics-type stylings and operation at a low price. Now it has been joined by a more expensive brother, the AT-LP140XP.
Both the ATLP120USB and AT-LP140XP are aimed at the DJ community. Despite that fact, the 120 has always been a part of audiophile demo lists. I expect the 140 to occupy the same lists, hence the reason for this review.
The 140, like the 120, provides the usual DJ tools. On the 140, you’ll find a platter strobe/light, forward/reverse operation, variable pitch control and retractable light.
The AT-LP120USB offers a built-in phono amplifier and USB port for vinyl ripping. Ideal, if you’re short of cash. The inclusion of these accessories also adds a measure of veiling noise to the sound of the 120. The AT-LP140XP gives you none of that. This enhances the AT-LP140XP’s inherent audiophile aspirations although those DJ accessories will negate that aim to some extent because those features will also inject a measure of noise into the signal. What the hi-fi gods give with one hand, they take away with another.
In place of the USB port and the Phono amp switch on the rear of the 120, the 140 offers a meaty IEC power socket. This means that the kettle lead supplied with the 140 can be upgraded to something sonically superior. I would heartily recommend that you do so. External phono cables are supplied with the 140 to slot into the rear-mounted sockets, sitting next to the Ground knob. Again, I would recommend upgrading these cables too.
Like the 120, the 140 gives you a choice of three speeds, including 78rpm. The 78rpm option is not immediately obvious but can be selected by pressing both the 33 and 45 buttons simultaneously. The 140 includes ‘Tempo range’ buttons. Here, you can select +/-8 or 16% ‘tempo’ range. +/-24% is selected by pressing both the +/-8% and 16% buttons simultaneously. You may be surprised to learn that, apart from use as a gimmicky DJ tool, this option is useful for dedicated 78 users who know that 78rpm discs rarely run exactly at 78rpm. Different record labels cut their discs at different speeds. For example, British-made Columbias tended to be recorded at a speed between 78 and 81rpm, those made in America often played correctly at 76 or 77rpm. And that’s not the half of it. Hence, this option will be of great use to ’78’ fans.
The S-shaped arm on both the 120 and 140 looks the same and includes an attendant anti-skate wheel, arm lift, secure arm rest clip plus the useful wheel at the base of the arm to change the arm’s height.
I had a quick chat with Audio-Technica about this turntable who confirmed that the LP140XP features a different motor to the AT-LP120X. One with higher torque.
The new AT-XP3 cartridge is a DJ-specific design with a conical stylus tip that features a V-Mount dual magnet construction, carbon fibre-reinforced ABS cantilever and nylon wire suspension. It is built for excellent tracking, manual cueing and back-cueing. It’s attached to the tonearm via a standard, SME-type screw-on connector and arrives attached to an Audio-Technica AT-HS6BK headshell.
The other difference between the 140 and 120 is the plinth. The 140’s plinth is deeper in size and feels more robust and heavier. In fact, the 140’s plinth is a full 2kg heavier.
The reason? According to Audio-Technica, “The construction of the LP140 is more damped, which reduces feedback and colouration from low frequency sounds.”
The 140 arrives with a cover but, if sound quality is a priority, I would recommend removing it before play to eradicate the inherent vibrations you get from it and the hinges. Loosely place the cover over the turntable when you’re not using it. Finally thumbs up to the platter on the 140 which includes a damping material underneath to reduce ringing.
The 140 is a mature 120. Grown up, rather serious and better built but it retains its DJ aspirations.
SOUND QUALITY
OK, busy sound test for this turntable, so let’s crack on.
First up, I wanted to compare the 140 with a similar (yet cheaper) turntable so chose the Lenco L3808. Why not Audio-Technica’s 120? Because the Lenco is one of the very best sub-budget (i.e. below £200) turntables on the market and received an award-winning review from myself. It’s proven and dominates its own market sector. The Lenco also offers a similar chassis layout to the 140 but lower quality build and cheaper components. The 140 looks like a Rolls Royce version of the Lenco L-3808, in other words. Like the 140, the Lenco is also direct drive and features a stylus with a conical tip. So there’s many aspects of the Lenco that reflects the 140 in general terms.
As I say, the Lenco is offered at a much lower price point so the 140 should be sonically superior.
Once slight Lenco wrinkle. The cartridge on the Lenco is supposed to be set with a 3g tracking force but I changed that to 2g a long time ago because I found the sound improved when I initiated that particular change. There’s parallels with the 140 on that front. We’ll get to that further below.
First off, a straight A-B comparison using King Crimson’s LP and the title track to Three of a Perfect Pair (EG).
Are there differences? There are indeed. The first element of the 140 sound I noticed was the extra air and space in and around the soundstage. The midrange was not as closed in or as claustrophobic which enabled extra detail to infuse the music. Hence, the vocal featured much more nuance and hence a greater degree of emotion – and this vocal is certainly full of that. More than that, the vocal was double tracked, so the intricacy of the harmonies were also easier to tease apart.
The Fripp guitar, a complex beast at the best of times, was also easier to follow and track with is own elaborate and intricate multi-string interplay. The extra space enabled the ear to better hear the starting and stopping of notes. That is, there was less lumpen mush and more precision. The same could be said of the Bruford drumming which not only offered the first signs of organic response but also – for the first time – provided a noticeable reverb tail on cymbal splashes.
Bass was also strong, meaty, weighty and full of heft. Both from the drum kit and the bass guitar. If anything, the bass could be a bit thuggish on the 140. A bit of a brute, you might say. Effective and great for the DJ but for longterm audiophile listening, I wondered if the cartridge was over-egging things a bit. Also, if I was super critical on the midrange, I’d say that the 140 was a touch – just a touch – edgy. A bit too pronounced and emphasised. The extra air and space I mentioned above helped matters but I wondered if I could enhance the effect.
Hence, I reached for the cartridge and backed off a bit on the tracking. Tracking is essential for audiophiles but too much can push the bass too far and add stress to mids. DJs love extra tracking because it makes their jobs easier and their turntable DJ tool that much more effective. Audiophiles need tracking but not to excess. So, I pulled back on the tracking force for this cartridge and lowered it from 3g to 2g and listened.
The result was a bit of a relief, to be honest. Bass was pulled from the brink and was no longer as bloated. It remained punchy with good transient performance because of the basic direct drive motor but not headache-inducing while the midrange relaxed, leaving the detail to emerge in a naturalistic manner. Highlights now were the incisive Bruford ride cymbal, the Fripp string plucks on his rhythm guitar offered a richer and deeper tone while the Belew vocal flowed in a sincere fashion, whereas earlier the vocal could be a little forced. The final tracking force figure remains down to you. I pulled mine back to 2g but, with more time and tweaking, I might have settled on a different figure. Say, 2.2g or whatever. If you do change the tracking figure, by all means experiment to find your own sweet spot.
So what happens if you remove the cartridge altogether and replace it with an audiophile design? One aimed at sound quality instead of DJ work? In an attempt to transform the 140 into a hi-fi turntable, I installed an Ortofon 2M Red and compared that with the original configuration.
As expected, the 2M Red proved superior in sound terms with a much larger soundstage that was infused with extra space to allow further detail into the music. That music sounded almost elegant in comparison to the original Audio-Technica DJ cartridge with a new found sense of tonal realism, especially in the Fripp rhythm guitar and the Bruford drum strikes. You felt that you were nearer to the sonic truth now. The Belew vocal offered a fragile quality to it so that, when he put power behind it, you were not too sure if it would break sightly during the crescendo. Hence, there were now humanistic elements in the sound were little could be sensed beforehand. Treble offered a purer, focused response while bass naturalism was also on the rise.
In this configuration, with a 2M Red attached, I was reminded just how close the 140 was in approach and price to the Fluance RT83: another lifestyle-oriented design with audiophile pretensions.
So I used the same cartridge and headshell on both turntables and performed an A-B comparison with the two. I was fascinated to see how the 140’s direct drive mechanism would perform against the RT83’s belt-drive system. Both featured a heavy plinth and both were sonically compromised: the 140 with its DJ accessories while the RT83 has a built-in semi-automatic system.
The result was a score draw. The RT83 provided a complex midrange, layered with detail and a sense of refinement that the 140 couldn’t match. That said, the 140 was better in transient terms. The notion of notes starting and stopping on the dot. That element of precision and focus was notable with the 140. On this point, the 140 left the RT83 in its dust. Vocally, the RT83 provided a superior emotional complexity. An impassioned delivery that gave the RT83 a fragility and sensitivity. The 140 offered more life and vitality in the vocals. It provided greater energy and oomph to the vocal performance. Bass had character and an organic sense from the RT83 but greater punch and slam via the 140.
There are pros and cons for both although, with a 2M Red attached to both, the 140 is almost £100 more expensive. That value for money aspect might be the killer bottom line for many.
Having tweaked the AT-LP140XP towards a more audiophile sound I wonder how the turntable might fare against a true audiophile design, albeit one that is priced lower, at £249. The Rega RP1 is made for superior sound quality, though, without the 140’s DJ bells and whistles. It’s stripped to focus on sound and sound alone. So how did the AT-LP140XP measure up against this audiophile specialist?
I put the original DJ cartridge back onto the 140 for this test because the Rega arrives with a conical stylus tip on its cartridge.
I also changed the music to vocal jazz and Nat ‘King’ Cole’s Autumn Leaves from a Capitol Best of…
The Rega offered a lower noise presentation which enabled delicate details to come forth, it also added a relaxed and calming tone to the King delivery. The backing orchestra provided a complex and multi-layered suite of information rich in detail and maturity in its performance. There was a rich and tonally superior aspect to the Rega’s presentation. In comparison, the AT-LP140XP sounded uptight, restrictive and unsettled.
The AT-LP140XPis an admirable lifestyle design, but its not a true audiophile product. This is not a bad thing in broad terms but, if you’re interested in purchasing a AT-LP140XP, you need to understand exactly what you’re buying and why.
CONCLUSION
The Audio-Technica AT-LP140XP is not an audiophile turntable but it is an admirable lifestyle design that will please many analogue fans. It has a tough fight to establish dominance against the worthy and cheaper Fluance RT83 but there is still much to like about the AT-LP140XP. Those positive elements emanate largely from the sturdy and heavy chassis plus its direct drive mechanism. With a responsive and vital bass plus an energetic midrange performance, the AT-LP140XP is a likeable and intriguing turntable and worthy of its inclusion on your demo list.
AUDIO-TECHNICA AT-LP140XP TURNTABLE
Price: £379. If the AT-XP3 is bought separately, £49.
AT-XP3 cartridge mounted on AT-HS6BK headshell, £79.
ATN-XP3 replacement stylus for AT-XP3, £25
Website: eu.audio-technica.com
GOOD: bass, midrange precision, easy to install, upgrade possibilities
BAD: DJ furniture, cartridge
RATING: 7
If you would like to purchase this turntable, you can from the following links:
BUY FROM HERE:
EUROPE: https://amzn.to/35ZFNSU
[Don’t forget to check out my Facebook Group, The Audiophile Man: Hi-Fi & Music here: www.facebook.com/groups/theaudiophileman for exclusive postings, exclusive editorial and more!]
REFERENCE
Lenco L-3808 turntable
Rega RP1
Fluance RT83
Ortofon 2M Red
Trichord Dino phono amplifier
Audiolab 6000A amplifier
Spendor S3/5R speakers
Tellurium Q cabling
Harmonic Resolution Systems Noise Reduction Components
All vinyl was cleaned using an Audio Desk’s Ultrasonic Pro Vinyl Cleaner
Hi Paul, I am new to the vinyl world. I bought AT-LP120 (regret that I did not find your review when ordering it). I have a question: can the 120 or 140 turntable use MC cartridge (with using an external phono stage)? Thank you!
I wouldn’t go MC for either turntable, the parts/build quality are not up to it and you would not be able to maximise the MC cart’s higher performance. The result would be a nice noise, sure but you’d be wasting most of the money you had spent on the cart in the first place.
Hi Paul,
Congrats for your reviews!
I want to buy one turntable and I was looking for an AT-LP140XP or a Pionner PLX-500. I’m not a DJ but I like heavy and resistante turntables. I have a Toshiba SR-F335 with an Ortofon Nightclub and a Technics Direct Drive SL-DD33 (I want to change this one because I can’t change the Shell, only the arm). I was looking for this type of turntables for the design and robustness. What’s your advice?
Best regards
Hi Valrer – if you enjoy the DJ turntable ‘look’ with a big bass bottom end and all that, the 140 would be my choice. The company’s own LP5x offers superior sound and kinda looks similar, if I could throw that into the mix. Although you lose the pitch slider, etc.
Hi Paul,
I have a TT Telefunken S600 HIFI, equipped with Goldring E3 stylus and tonearm Ortofon AS212, is it worth to replace this Telefunken with AT140? thanks
I know very little about the S600. Saying that, the S600 and the 140 a two very different turntables. As you also now, having read my review of the 140. Can I ask why you’re looking at the 140 as a purchase?
Because 140 look to me very balanced in price/quality and look nice:) and is new, vs my actual TT which was build around ’76 and the tonearm have a problem when the record ended, the arm jumps up and hit the cover dust, and really I don’t want to try to fix this arm. and I don’t want to spent 1500 EUR on a Technics 😉
If you like the look of the 140 then I’d encourage a demo, if you possibly can (in store or at home). Just be aware of the points in my review but yes, there’s a lot going for the 140. It has a lot of good points.
Hi,
I’ve been looking at upgrading to a direct drive deck that I’ll be DJing on as well as casual listening. I’m stuck between the AT140 brand new or second hand Technics Sl1200 (mk2 or 3). Cost of the technics being the deciding factor as well as longevity. Cheers mate
Hello,
I am looking for a turntable but would like to leverage a couple of components I already have: (1) Audio Technica AT-VM95ML/H cartridge & headshell with zero time and (2) a Schiit Mani 2 phono preamp.
Therefore, I’d like to get a turntable that will readily accept the AT-VM95ML/H and also not pay for a turntable with a built-in phone preamp of indeterminable quantity since I already have a quality, external preamp.
I don’t need the AT-LP140XP’s DJ capabilities but would appreciate feedback on how well it (or another suggestion) would fit my needs.
Thank you.
Hi Norval – do you have a budget, perchance?
Hi Paul,
The AT-LP140XP is right up against my budget of $500 USD. I could inch a little higher if the value is there.
Thank you,
Norval
Hi Paul,
I am new in the vinyl world, and i want pick up, and i want from you to tell me a good and durable one. About budget, like 400 euros max, if it’s possible.
Thank you.
The Pro-Jects T1 or Debut III are recommended or the Audio-Technica 120x is also a good one at that price.
Thank you!
Hi again,
I also want some speakers, durable, too, and i want another advice from you. Budget: 70 euros, it it’s possible.
Thank you.
Look for the original Q Acoustics 3020 – the 3020i is more expensive. Look for the original 3020 model. Worth spending a bit more on this one too.
Thank you!
Hello, Paul.
In the review I read that you recommend upgrading the power plug and the Rca cables. Which one do you recommend best? Thank you very much for your help.
Regards, Dursun
Not sure if it’s in your price range, Dursun but check out this one: https://theaudiophileman.com/xt3-mains-cable-from-qed/
Hello, Paul. I bought the cable you mentioned, it is 2 meters long. I plugged it into my system and into my turntable. Low noise was pleasing, but there was a change in the tone that I did not like. I had a loss between 60 and 128 hertz. There were losses in the mids of the song, the instrument that was there before was pushed to the background, I didn’t like this. Is there another cable you can recommend? Finally, I’m happy to be able to hear the differences. I’m using atlp140xp and I’m not a good boy. Thank you, if you have any other suggestions, I’m ready to try. Best regards, Dursun.
I had a much different experience with the lp140xp.
On the face it looks like a goof piece of kit. I found VERY little reviews on YouTube about it except for Andrew’s which really wasn’t a review but more a comparison.
In any event, I purchased the lp140xp.
Sadly, I sent it right back.
The whole tome arm assembly was loose, it moved or shall I saw wobbled back and forth when I was adjusting the vta.
The plinth, when playing a record and slight tapping on the plinth during playback to check dampening, produced loud thumps through my wharfedale speakers.
The target light, horrible, wobbles and is very loose when in the up position.
The tone arm lift has zero damping (or at least mine did) and zero resistance, when cuing the tone arm up the entire arm bounced, it was not smooth at all.
The power cable would not stay seated in the rear of the unit, inhad to push it back in numerous times.
The platter when seated on the spindle wobbled under the slightest pressure. And this is aimed at the dj market?
The stobe tower housing on my unit was loose as well and not very reassuring when used.
Overall a very dismal offering from AT.
I would suggest getting the lp120xusb if you just want a direct drive for just listening to records and save some money rather thank forking out $500 for the lp140xp.
I packed it up and returned it immediately
Hi Paul,
Nice review. I had a 120-USB and sold it because the preamp didn’t really help by introducing noise and I wouldn’t venture into ripping it out. I bought the 140XP and I fairly pleased with it. I use a Bellari tube-preamp and have B&O Beolab 4000 speakers. I didn’t upgrade cable though. I have to check that department.
My only upgrade is that I use an AT-440mla which IMHO is an awesome cartridge. I don’t know why all reviews and comparisons bring the Ortofon M cartridges and never the higher audio-technica cartridges. I have an AT mono and the 540ML, which is the new incarnation of the 440mla (and mlb). The stock cartridge is resting there on the side as a backup and to reinstall it in case I sell this table. With my microline cartridge the sound this table produces is really nice and balanced so it’s good choice for someone wanting a better sound without breaking the bank.
I’d like to hear you thoughts on the higher AT carts, including the 440mla/540ML.
Best,
Mario
Hi Mario – yes, decent cart. I wouldn’t upgrade any further in cart terms, though. I think the arm would be a bottleneck. As is though? Sure, sounds ok to me. If you are interested in further upgrades I would look at the mat and isolating the deck on quality shelving (if you’re not already doing so) plus isolation feet (even if you are using good shelving). The power cable, yes but also a decent power brick to plug that into (in case you’re using a basic white thing).
Power brick, isolation and cables are my next steps. Mat is there already. I read somewhere that upgrading the cart cables and the (more challenging though) cabling inside de arm with something like a Cardas wiring should really improve. I’m not into disassembling things so I might not go further. Best regards, Mario